Steerable Tool Transmission for Stable Omnidirectional Tip Rotation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current steerable surgical instruments face challenges with reduced dexterity due to the fulcrum effect and lack of wrist-like movements, leading to instability and difficulty in performing complex procedures, especially in minimally invasive surgeries where rotational stability and omnidirectional movement are crucial.

Innovation Solution

A mechanical transmission system (MTS) for steerable tools that includes a plurality of longitudinally arranged longitudinal members with anisotropic area moments of inertia, constrained at specific points to enhance rotational stability and prevent the spiral kinematic chain effect, allowing for omnidirectional movement and rotational freedom at the instrument tip.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If omni-directional articulated instruments are used to provide wrist-like movements, then dexterity and maneuverability are improved, but tip stability decreases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedexterityVSAvoidtip stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic stabilization system where the counter-rotating mechanism automatically adjusts to maintain tip stability. When the instrument wrist bends, the first and second articulated sections rotate in opposite directions, dynamically compensating for rotational displacement and maintaining tip stability throughout the range of motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the rotational parameter by implementing counter-rotation of the articulated sections. The first articulated section rotates in one direction while the second articulated section rotates in the opposite direction, effectively canceling out rotational displacement and maintaining tip orientation stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of articulated sections is increased to enable omni-directional movement, then degrees of freedom are improved, but mechanical complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedegrees of freedomVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric articulation where the first and second articulated sections have different rotation axes and movement characteristics. This asymmetric design enables omni-directional movement while maintaining a relatively simple mechanical structure by avoiding symmetric redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the instrument into segmented articulated sections (first articulated section and second articulated section) that can move independently. This segmentation allows each section to contribute specific degrees of freedom while keeping individual section complexity low.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Stability of the object's composition

If rotational constraint is applied to longitudinal members to prevent spiral kinematic chain effect, then rotational stability is improved, but omnidirectional movement capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational stabilityVSAvoidomnidirectional movement
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic rotational constraint where the degree of rotational restriction varies along the length of the longitudinal members. The proximal portion has higher rotational constraint for stability, while the distal portion has lower constraint to allow omnidirectional tip movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different rotational constraints to different portions of the longitudinal members. The proximal portion is more rotationally constrained to prevent spiral kinematic chain effect, while the distal portion allows greater freedom for omnidirectional movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The MTS provides improved rotational stability and omnidirectional movement, reducing backlash and maintaining tip stability even in bent positions, enhancing the dexterity and maneuverability of steerable surgical instruments while minimizing invasiveness.

Implementation Method 1

a plane section of at least one longitudinal member (110) demonstrates an anisotropic area moment of inertia

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMoment of Inertia: Moment of Inertia

Implementation Method 2

The majority of the longitudinal members (110) are each axially rotationally constrained at one or more constraining points along the bendable distal part (130) or along the shaft region (132)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS10962093B2Torque-transmitting steering mechanism for a steerable tool
Publication Date: 2021.03.30 STEERABLE INSTR NV
  • US10962093B2 patent drawing
  • US10962093B2 patent drawing
  • US10962093B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a steerable tool with proximal and distal ends comprising a mechanical transmission system (MTS), shaft region, omnidirectionally moveable bendable proximal part (BPP), and omnidirectionally moveable bendable distal part responsive to movement of the BPP, where the MTS comprises longitudinal members (LM) each having proximal and distal ends, arranged in a longitudinal direction around a fictive tube, and has a corresponding transmission shaft region (TSR), transmission bendable proximal part (TBPP) and transmission bendable distal part (TBDP), wherein a plane section of at least one LM has an anisotropic area moment of inertia, and the majority of the LMs are axially rotationally constrained at one or more constraining points along the TBDP or TSR, the LMs are longitudinally slidable with respect to each constraining point, and the MTS is configured such that the TBDP tip is axially rotatable in a bent position by a complementary rotation of the TBPP.