Steering Actuator Capability Estimation for Autonomous Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous driving systems fail to accurately estimate and adjust steering actuator capabilities in real-time based on dynamic vehicle and environmental conditions, leading to potential collisions or maneuverability issues due to over- or under-predicted path planning.

Innovation Solution

A system that estimates rack force and motor health in real-time using a combination of a lookup table and a trained model, such as a neural network, to calculate maximum achievable steering wheel angle, velocity, and acceleration, and adjusts the planned path accordingly to align with the vehicle's capabilities, considering factors like temperature, tire pressure, and surface friction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If path planning is over-predicted to improve maneuverability, then the vehicle can execute more aggressive paths, but the actual path may cause collision with obstacles

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemaneuverabilityVSAvoidcollision safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors actual steering actuator performance against predicted capabilities and adjusts path planning in real-time. Sensors provide feedback on actual steering angle, velocity, and acceleration, which are compared with predicted values to dynamically adjust the path plan and prevent collisions while maintaining maneuverability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The path planning system transitions from static predicted capabilities to dynamic real-time capability estimation. The system continuously updates the achievable angle, velocity, and acceleration based on current vehicle state and environmental conditions, allowing the path plan to adapt dynamically rather than relying on fixed predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If path planning is under-predicted to improve safety, then collision risk is reduced, but the planned path becomes too conservative and limits maneuverability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision safetyVSAvoidmaneuverability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Real-time sensor feedback on actual steering performance allows the system to safely increase path aggressiveness when capabilities are confirmed, eliminating the need for conservative under-prediction. The system only plans paths that are verified to be within actual actuator capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary verification of actuator capabilities through health monitoring and real-time estimation before finalizing the path plan. This preliminary assessment ensures the path is both safe and optimal, avoiding the conservatism of under-prediction while maintaining safety through pre-verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If real-time estimation of actuator capabilities is implemented to improve path planning accuracy, then path execution reliability is enhanced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath planning accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The steering actuator performs multiple functions: it executes path planning commands while simultaneously providing feedback on its actual capabilities and health status. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate monitoring systems, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The steering actuator self-monitors its own health and capability status, providing real-time feedback without requiring external diagnostic systems. This self-service capability reduces system complexity by eliminating separate monitoring components while maintaining accurate capability estimation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If health monitoring of the actuator is continuously performed to improve reliability, then actuator failure is detected earlier, but computational load and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial health monitoring by focusing on the most critical actuator parameters (steering angle, velocity, acceleration) rather than comprehensively monitoring all possible failure modes. This selective monitoring maintains high reliability while minimizing computational load and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary health assessment using pre-established models and thresholds, allowing rapid evaluation of actuator status without complex real-time analysis. This preliminary screening detects most failures quickly while reserving computational resources for detailed analysis only when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11827293B2Real-time estimation of achievable angle, velocity, and acceleration capabilities of steering actuator
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US11827293B2 patent drawing
  • US11827293B2 patent drawing
  • US11827293B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system comprises a processor and a memory storing instructions which when executed by the processor configure the processor to estimate a rack force for a steering system of a vehicle based on current driving and environmental conditions and estimate a health of an actuator of the steering system of the vehicle. The instructions configure the processor to estimate maximum achievable angle, velocity, and acceleration for the actuator of the steering system based on the estimated rack force and the estimated health of the actuator. The instructions configure the processor to provide to the steering system a path planned for the vehicle based on the estimated maximum achievable angle, velocity, and acceleration for the actuator of the steering system.