Steering Column Telescopic Restriction Impact Absorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional steering column devices detach the inner jacket from the outer jacket after absorbing impact energy, rendering steering operation impossible.

Innovation Solution

A steering column device with a telescopic-position restricting structure, including a restricting protrusion that engages with rear-end and front-end restricting walls, preventing detachment and allowing steering operation by absorbing impact energy through friction within the contraction rail part, eliminating the need for additional structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If shear pins are used to allow inner jacket movement for impact energy absorption, then impact energy absorption is improved, but steering operation becomes impossible after impact due to inner jacket detachment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy absorptionVSAvoidsteering operation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The restricting protrusion is divided into two functional parts: a base portion that engages with the rear-end restricting wall to prevent detachment, and a stopper portion that fractures to enable impact energy absorption. This segmentation allows the structure to perform both functions separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The restricting protrusion is pre-configured with a fragile shear part that will fracture under impact load. The base portion is pre-positioned to engage with the rear-end restricting wall, establishing the prevention function before impact occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If additional structures are added to prevent inner jacket detachment, then steering operation capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering operation capabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The restricting protrusion serves multiple functions: it prevents detachment through engagement with the rear-end restricting wall, absorbs impact energy through stopper fracture, and restricts telescopic position through engagement with front-end and rear-end restricting walls. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The detachment prevention function and impact energy absorption function are merged into a single restricting protrusion structure, rather than using separate components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Loss of energy

If inner jacket is allowed to move freely for impact absorption, then impact energy absorption is improved, but inner jacket rotates relative to outer jacket preventing steering operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy absorptionVSAvoidsteering operation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The restricting protrusion is segmented into a base portion for rotational constraint and a stopper portion for impact absorption, allowing simultaneous prevention of rotation and energy dissipation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base portion is pre-configured to engage with the rear-end restricting wall, establishing rotational constraint before impact occurs, while the stopper portion is pre-configured to fracture under impact load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures the inner jacket remains engaged with the outer jacket, enabling continuous steering functionality after impact energy absorption by utilizing the friction within the contraction rail part to absorb energy without additional components.

Implementation Method 1

the stopper comes into contact with the front-end restricting wall, fractures from the shear part, and is detached from the restricting protrusion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFracture: Fracture Mechanics

Implementation Method 2

upon application of a load of a set value or greater to the inner jacket in the axial direction, the restricting protrusion moves inside the telescopic rail part forward in the axial direction together with the inner jacket and the stopper comes into contact with the front-end restricting wall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact energy absorption: Impact Force

Implementation Method 3

absorbing the impact energy through friction within the contraction rail part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3124355B1Steering column device
Publication Date: 2018.12.05 FUJI KIKO CO LTD
  • EP3124355B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3124355B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3124355B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A steering column device (1) has a telescopic-position restricting structure (6). In adjustment of a telescopic position, a restricting protrusion (41) moves inside a telescopic rail part (33) between a front-end restricting wall (36) and a rear-end restricting wall (35). Upon application of a load of a set value or greater to an inner jacket (4) in its axial direction, the restricting protrusion (41) moves inside the telescopic rail part (33) forward in the axial direction together with the inner jacket (4) and a stopper (41b) comes into contact with the front-end restricting wall (36), fractures from a shear part (41c), and is detached from the restricting protrusion (41), thereby allowing the restricting protrusion (41) to move inside the contraction rail part (32) forward in the axial direction.