Steering Control Unit Collision Avoidance Assistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing collision avoidance assistance devices cause uncomfortable feelings for drivers due to excessive steering control, leading to potential cancellation of the assistance system, either due to insufficient control amounts or excessive control exceeding the driver's holding force, and fail to effectively communicate the collision avoidance direction.

Innovation Solution

The system performs initial steering assistance by rotating the steering wheel by a control amount based on the driver's holding force for a duration determined by vehicle response characteristics, ensuring the driver recognizes the operation and direction, with the option to adjust the control amount and duration to prevent cancellation and minimize lateral acceleration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the steering control amount by the system is increased to ensure collision avoidance, then the collision avoidance effectiveness is improved, but the driver may feel uncomfortable and the steering control may be cancelled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance effectivenessVSAvoiddriver comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary steering control during a first predetermined time period after collision risk is detected. This initial steering action prepares the vehicle for collision avoidance while allowing the driver time to react. The steering control amount is set to a first value during this period, which is less than the second value used after the time period expires, enabling gradual driver adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The steering control amount is dynamically adjusted based on the elapsed time since collision risk detection. During the first predetermined time period, the control amount is set to a first value that is smaller than the second value used after the time period. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to balance collision avoidance effectiveness with driver comfort and awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the steering control amount by the system is decreased to reduce uncomfortable feelings, then the driver comfort is improved, but the steering control may be cancelled under driver unconsciousness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver comfortVSAvoidsteering control cancellation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a two-stage steering control strategy. During the first predetermined time period, it applies a smaller first steering control amount that is less likely to cause driver discomfort or unconscious cancellation. After this time period expires, it transitions to a larger second steering control amount that ensures effective collision avoidance while the driver is fully aware of the system's action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial steering control (first value) during the initial time period instead of the full control amount (second value). This partial action is sufficient to begin the collision avoidance maneuver while minimizing driver discomfort and cancellation risk. The full control amount is applied afterward when the driver is more likely to recognize and accept the system's intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of information

If the steering wheel is rotated by a large control amount to ensure collision avoidance, then the collision avoidance direction is clearly communicated to the driver, but excessive lateral acceleration occurs causing uncomfortable feelings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance direction recognitionVSAvoidlateral acceleration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary steering control with a smaller control amount during the first predetermined time period. This initial action begins to communicate the collision avoidance direction to the driver while generating minimal lateral acceleration. After the time period expires, the system applies a larger control amount to complete the avoidance maneuver, by which time the driver has already perceived the intended direction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The steering control amount transitions dynamically from a first value during the initial time period to a second value afterward. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to balance information communication (direction recognition) with physical comfort (lateral acceleration management) at different stages of the collision avoidance process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2979956B1Collision avoidance assistance device and collision avoidance assistance method
Publication Date: 2018.04.25 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • EP2979956B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2979956B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2979956B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A collision avoidance assistance device configured to perform driver steering assistance to avoid a collision between a vehicle and an obstacle, the device includes a steering control unit configured to perform the steering assistance in a case where it is determined that there is a possibility of the collision between the vehicle and the obstacle. During a period from commencement of the steering assistance to elapsing of a first time determined by response characteristics of a lateral acceleration of the vehicle, the steering control unit is configured to rotate a steering wheel of the vehicle in a collision avoidance direction by a control amount determined based on a steering holding force of the driver.