Stem Gripper and Box Transfer for Space-Limited Mushroom Harvesting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mushroom harvesting systems face challenges in automating the process due to limited vertical space in mushroom growing beds, damage to mushrooms during harvesting, and disruption of the growing environment, while manual harvesting is inefficient and leads to yield reduction.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a stem gripper and box transfer apparatus that can autonomously or semi-autonomously harvest and pack mushrooms, using a harvester sub-system with a vision system, lift sub-system, and packer sub-system to adapt to existing infrastructure, minimize damage, and optimize harvesting schedules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated harvesting systems are introduced, then productivity and harvesting efficiency are improved, but the limited vertical space in existing mushroom growing beds prevents the use of standard harvesting systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting efficiencyVSAvoidvertical space availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from vertical space utilization to horizontal operation. The robotic arm operates horizontally along the length of the growing bed, with the end effector reaching vertically only when necessary to harvest mushrooms. This dimensional shift allows automation without requiring additional vertical clearance in the constrained growing environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The harvesting system is divided into modular components: a mobile platform, a robotic arm with multiple degrees of freedom, and a specialized end effector. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and enables the system to operate within tight spatial constraints by coordinating the motion of individual segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual harvesting is performed, then flexibility and adaptability to varying mushroom sizes are maintained, but productivity and harvesting speed are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting flexibilityVSAvoidharvesting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The end effector employs dynamic gripping mechanisms with force control that can adapt to varying mushroom sizes and stem diameters. The robotic system uses real-time vision feedback to adjust gripping force and positioning, maintaining the flexibility of manual harvesting while achieving automated speeds and consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates vision systems and sensors that provide real-time feedback on mushroom position, size, and orientation. This feedback loop enables the robotic arm and end effector to dynamically adjust their actions, replicating the adaptive decision-making of manual harvesters while operating at automated speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If intensive harvesting is performed to maximize yield, then productivity is improved, but the risk of damaging mushrooms and disrupting the growing environment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop yieldVSAvoidmushroom damage and environmental disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces harsh mechanical harvesting methods with a specialized end effector that uses controlled gripping forces and precise positioning. This substitution allows for gentle mushroom extraction that minimizes damage to the fruiting bodies and surrounding substrate, enabling intensive harvesting without compromising mushroom quality or disrupting the growing environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts harvesting parameters such as gripping force, arm motion speed, and end effector positioning based on real-time sensor data. This parameter optimization allows maximum harvesting intensity while maintaining forces and motions below damage thresholds, reconciling high productivity with mushroom integrity and environmental preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250228170A1Box Transfer Apparatus and Stem Gripper for Automated Harvesting Systems
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 MYCIONICS INC
  • US20250228170A1 patent drawing
  • US20250228170A1 patent drawing
  • US20250228170A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A box transfer apparatus for an automated harvesting system is provided, the box transfer apparatus comprising: a frame; a plurality of trays to support a plurality of boxes; and a box gripper moveable within the frame using a gantry coupled to the frame; wherein the box gripper is configured to grasp boxes and move the grasped boxes between the frame and an adjacent frame used to convey the boxes to be used in receiving picked items from the automated harvesting system. A stem gripper for an automated harvesting system is also provided, the stem gripper comprising: a housing comprising at least one motor; a pair of contoured fingers operable by the at least one motor to rotate above a common axis to grasp stems of items picked by the automated harvesting system; and a drive mechanism to move the stem gripper from a discard bin to a box for loading.