Energy Storage Charging Control Using Time-Variant SoS Limits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power systems face inefficiencies in managing energy storage, particularly in determining optimal charging and discharging strategies based on time-variant state-of-storage thresholds, leading to potential power dissipation and suboptimal energy utilization.

Innovation Solution

A power management system that includes a controller to determine a time-variant state-of-storage upper threshold (SUT) and state-of-storage (SoS) of an energy storage, which charges or discharges the storage based on power production and consumption predictions, ensuring efficient energy utilization and minimizing power dissipation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If energy storage is charged or discharged based on fixed thresholds, then control simplicity is maintained, but energy utilization efficiency deteriorates and power dissipation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy utilization efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic state-of-storage thresholds that automatically adjust based on predicted power production and consumption patterns. Instead of fixed thresholds, the system calculates time-variant upper and lower thresholds by comparing predicted excess power production with load requirements, enabling optimal charging/discharging decisions that adapt to changing conditions while maintaining automated control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary power production and consumption predictions to determine optimal charging/discharging thresholds before actual energy storage operations. By predicting excess power production and load requirements in advance, the system pre-calculates appropriate state-of-storage thresholds, avoiding reactive control and enabling proactive energy management that maximizes utilization efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of energy

If energy storage is charged during periods of excess power production, then energy wastage is reduced, but state-of-storage management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower dissipationVSAvoidstate-of-storage management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where actual power production and consumption data continuously update the prediction models. The system monitors real-time state-of-storage levels and compares them against dynamically calculated thresholds, using this feedback to adjust charging/discharging decisions. This closed-loop control ensures energy is charged during excess production periods while maintaining automated threshold management through learned patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through automated prediction and threshold adjustment without requiring manual intervention. The power management controller autonomously predicts power production and consumption, calculates optimal state-of-storage thresholds, and executes charging/discharging decisions based on these predictions, reducing the need for external management while minimizing power dissipation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If time-variant state-of-storage thresholds are implemented, then energy utilization is optimized, but computational requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy utilization efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational automation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary predictions of power production and consumption to establish time-variant thresholds before operational periods begin. By pre-calculating expected excess power production and load requirements, the system determines appropriate state-of-storage thresholds in advance, reducing real-time computational burden while maintaining optimized energy utilization through adaptive threshold management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of state-of-storage thresholds from fixed values to time-variant parameters that evolve based on predicted power production and consumption patterns. This parameter transformation enables the system to adapt thresholds dynamically, optimizing energy utilization by charging when excess production is predicted and discharging when load requirements exceed production, without requiring complex real-time calculations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230307915A1System and Methods for Controlling the Charging and Discharging of an Energy Storage Device
Publication Date: 2023.09.28 SOLAREDGE TECH LTD
  • US20230307915A1 patent drawing
  • US20230307915A1 patent drawing
  • US20230307915A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system which may comprise an energy storage, a storage interface and a controller. The energy storage may have a fining energy capacity. The storage interface may be coupled to the energy storage and may be configured to charge or discharge the energy storage. The controller may be configured to determine a state-of-storage (SoS) of the energy storage. The controller may further be configured to control the storage interface to charge and discharge the energy storage based on the state-of-storage of the energy storage, and based on a time-variant state-of-storage upper threshold.