Storage Controller Parallel Read Scheduling for Lower Latency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data storage systems face inefficiencies in processing read operations, particularly in managing parallel-read requests, leading to increased latency and response times due to suboptimal allocation of read commands across multiple cores.

Innovation Solution

A data storage system and method that dynamically assigns read commands to multiple cores, allowing for parallel processing based on the workload and operating speed of each core, optimizing read scheduling to minimize latency and maximize efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If read commands are processed sequentially by a single core, then device complexity is reduced, but read latency and response time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand processing structureVSAvoidread latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the command processing function into multiple independent cores (first core and second core), where each core can process read commands independently and in parallel. This segmentation allows simultaneous execution of multiple read operations, reducing overall read latency while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller dynamically determines whether to process read commands sequentially or in parallel based on real-time conditions such as the number of unprocessed commands and host requirements. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize between sequential simplicity and parallel performance based on actual workload demands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If parallel-read operations are implemented without dynamic scheduling, then read throughput increases, but system adaptability to varying workloads decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveread throughputVSAvoidworkload adaptation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic scheduling that adjusts the degree of parallelism based on workload characteristics. The controller evaluates the number of unprocessed commands and host read requirements to determine optimal processing strategies, enabling adaptation to varying workload intensities and patterns while maintaining high throughput when conditions favor parallel processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller continuously monitors system state including command queues and processing status, using this feedback to make real-time decisions about parallel-read execution. This feedback mechanism ensures the system adapts to changing workload conditions while maintaining optimized read throughput through informed scheduling decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If all read commands are processed in parallel, then response time decreases, but control complexity and scheduling difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments read commands into different categories (first read commands and second read commands) that can be processed by different cores according to their characteristics. This segmentation simplifies scheduling by creating clear assignment rules while enabling parallel processing, reducing response time without proportionally increasing control complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary that manages the complexity of parallel scheduling by implementing a standardized command assignment mechanism. It translates diverse read requirements into structured parallel operations, handling scheduling complexity centrally while allowing individual cores to execute simple, well-defined tasks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260023506A1Data storage system and operating method of data storage system
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 SK HYNIX INC
  • US20260023506A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023506A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023506A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present technology provides a data storage system, comprising: a data storage device and a controller configured to receive read requests from a host and control the data storage device by generating first read commands to read the data corresponding to first addresses. The controller is further configured to: generate second read commands to read the data corresponding to second addresses that are consecutive to the first addresses, in response to presence of a parallel-read execution condition during processing of the first read commands; make a comparison of a read command number with an outstanding first read count; assign each of the first read commands and the second read commands to either a first command processing operation or a second command processing operation based on a result of the comparison; and perform the first and second command processing operations in parallel within the reference time.