Dynamic Light Emitter Control for Stretchable Display Brightness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Stretchable display devices experience a decline in image quality when stretched, as the number of light emitting units in the ON mode changes, leading to a noticeable difference in the stretched image.

Innovation Solution

The electronic device includes a substrate and multiple electronic units, where the number of light emitting units in the ON mode is adjusted based on the device's state, ensuring that the image quality remains consistent before and after stretching. This is achieved by controlling the number of light emitting units per unit area, maintaining a ratio within specific limits (1.5×PPA_1≥PPA_2≥0.5×PPA_1) to minimize the difference in image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Illumination intensity

If the number of light emitting units in ON mode is increased to maintain image quality after stretching, then the brightness per unit area is improved, but the device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrightness per unit areaVSAvoidnumber of light emitting units
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of the number of light emitting units in ON mode based on the stretching state. The controller dynamically changes which light emitting units are activated - in the first state, a first number of units are ON, and in the second state, a second number of units are ON, where the second number is greater than the first number. This dynamic adaptation allows the display to maintain image quality across different stretching states without requiring all units to operate at maximum capacity simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the light emitting units based on stretching state. Specifically, it adjusts the number of active light emitting units (from first number to second number, where second > first) and controls the brightness per unit area to maintain the relationship 1.5×PPA_1≥PPA2≥0.5×PPA1. This parameter adjustment allows the system to compensate for the area increase during stretching while avoiding the need for a uniformly complex high-density configuration in all states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the number of light emitting units per unit area is maintained after stretching, then the image quality is preserved, but the total energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality consistencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the operational state of light emitting units based on the stretching condition. In the first state, only a first number of units are in ON mode, while in the second state, a second number (greater than the first) are in ON mode. This dynamic approach ensures image quality consistency by adapting to the changed geometry, while avoiding continuous high-energy consumption that would result from maintaining maximum brightness in all units at all times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes in the operational state of light emitting units. It controls the number of units in ON mode to change from the first number to the second number, and simultaneously controls the brightness per unit area (PPA) to maintain the relationship 1.5×PPA1≥PPA2≥0.5×PPA1. This coordinated parameter adjustment preserves image quality while managing energy consumption by not requiring all units to operate at full brightness simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Illumination intensity

If more light emitting units are activated in the second state, then the brightness per unit area is maintained, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrightness per unit areaVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic control of light emitting unit activation based on stretching state rather than requiring a static high-density configuration. The controller activates a first number of units in the first state and a second number (greater than the first) of units in the second state. This dynamic approach achieves the required brightness per unit area (maintaining 1.5×PPA1≥PPA2≥0.5×PPA1) without requiring the manufacture of a uniformly high-density array that would be needed if all units had to operate at maximum capacity in all states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250174182A1Electronic device
Publication Date: 2025.05.29 INNOLUX CORP
  • US20250174182A1 patent drawing
  • US20250174182A1 patent drawing
  • US20250174182A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic device able to be operated with a first state and a second state includes a substrate and electronic units. In a top view, the substrate has a first area in the first state and a second area in the second state, and the second area is greater than the first area. The electronic units are overlapped with the substrate. The number of the electronic units being in a mode of ON in the second state is greater than that in the first state. The electronic device has a PPA_1 that is defined as a number of the electronic units being in the mode of ON per unit area of the substrate in the first state, and a PPA_2 that is defined as a number of the electronic units being in the mode of ON per unit area of the substrate in the second state, and 1.5×PPA_1≥PPA_2≥0.5×PPA_1.