Structured Metal Oxide Catalyst for Naphtha-Maximizing Hydrocracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hydrocracking processes struggle to significantly increase naphtha yield from petroleum feedstocks, particularly heavy petroleum feedstocks, while producing middle distillates as the major product, and existing catalyst systems are expensive and do not effectively maximize naphtha content.

Innovation Solution

A catalyst comprising molybdenum (Mo) and a second metal oxide, such as iron (Fe), aluminium (Al), or silicon (Si), with an atomic ratio of Mo to Fe, Al, or Si ranging from 0.8 to 6, is used for hydrocracking, prepared by a method involving mixing metal precursors, refluxing, aging, and drying to form a structured catalyst for slurry phase reactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional hydrocracking processes are used to process heavy petroleum feedstock, then middle distillates are produced as major product, but naphtha yield does not increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenaphtha yieldVSAvoidprocessing efficiency of heavy feedstock
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical composition parameters of the catalyst system by using a specific ratio of Group VIB metal oxide (0.1-10 wt%) combined with zeolite (90-99.9 wt%), where zeolite provides both cracking and hydrogenation functions. This parameter change in catalyst composition enables simultaneous production of high naphtha yield (25-40% of feedstock) and high conversion of heavy hydrocarbons (75-90%), resolving the contradiction between naphtha yield and processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If existing catalyst systems are used for hydrocracking of heavy petroleum feedstock, then processing is possible, but catalyst cost is high and naphtha content is not maximized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenaphtha contentVSAvoidcatalyst cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a composite catalyst material combining Group VIB metal oxide (Mo, W) with zeolite (Y, USY, beta, ZSM-5). The zeolite component provides acidic sites for cracking while the metal oxide provides hydrogenation sites, creating a bifunctional composite that maximizes naphtha production. This composite structure reduces reliance on expensive single-metal catalysts while achieving superior naphtha yield (25-40%) compared to conventional systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of manufacture

If carbon rejection route is used for processing heavy petroleum feedstock, then processing is simplified, but light hydrocarbon yield is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidlight hydrocarbon yield
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention makes the catalyst system universally applicable to multiple reaction pathways by combining cracking and hydrogenation functions in a single bifunctional catalyst. The zeolite component handles cracking while metal oxide handles hydrogenation, allowing the system to simultaneously produce both light hydrocarbons (through cracking) and naphtha (through hydrogenation), thus achieving high light hydrocarbon yield without sacrificing processing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The catalyst achieves a high conversion of heavy hydrocarbons to naphtha and middle distillates, with a yield of at least 75-90% conversion of hydrocarbons above 540°C and 25-40% yield of naphtha in the product stream, improving naphtha production efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

hydrocracking of petroleum feedstock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

catalytic cracking of vacuum gas oil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCracking:

Implementation Method 3

hydrogen addition route involves cracking and hydrogenation reactions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Implementation Method 4

adding a solution of a first metal precursor to an aqueous solution of a second metal precursor and formic acid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 5

refluxing the reaction mixture followed by ageing to obtain a solid product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 6

adding a solution of a first metal precursor to an aqueous solution of a second metal precursor and formic acid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentUS20250269358A1Catalyst for naphtha maximization and method for preparing thereof
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORP LTD
  • US20250269358A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention pertains to a catalyst comprising well-defined structured metal oxides and mixed metal oxide and a method for the preparation of the catalyst by hydrolysis and precipitation methods. The catalyst comprises a first metal oxide and a second metal oxide, wherein metal of the first metal oxide is molybdenum (Mo) and metal of the second metal oxide is selected from a group comprises iron (Fe), aluminium (Al), silicon (Si) and a mixture thereof; wherein the catalyst has an atomic ratio of Mo to Fe, Al or Si in a range of 0.8 to 6. The catalyst is utilized for the maximization of naphtha through hydrocracking of petroleum feedstock.