Strut-Braced Wing Thinned Portions Shockwave Drag

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional strut-braced wing systems experience increased interference drag at transonic speeds due to shockwave formation between the wing and strut, leading to reduced flight efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a wing and strut configuration with thinned portions that create an air flow channel, increasing the channel area spanwise and reducing air acceleration, thereby minimizing shockwave strength and drag. The wing and strut have varying thickness and curvature profiles to manage airflow and reduce interference drag.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional strut-braced wing system is used, then structural support is provided, but shockwaves form causing increased interference drag at transonic speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidinterference drag
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating thinned portions at specific locations on the wing and strut where they intersect vertically. These localized geometric modifications change the airflow characteristics only in the critical region where shockwaves form, while maintaining the overall structural integrity and thickness of the wing and strut elsewhere. This resolves the contradiction by providing structural support through the bulk geometry while reducing interference drag through localized thinning at the intersection zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the wing and strut by creating thinned portions with reduced thickness in the spanwise direction. This parameter modification alters the airflow acceleration through the channel between the wing and strut, thereby reducing shockwave strength and interference drag at transonic speeds, while the overall structural parameters remain sufficient to provide necessary support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If thinned portions are created to reduce shockwaves, then interference drag decreases, but structural strength may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference dragVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The thinned portions are created only in specific localized regions where the wing and strut intersect vertically, rather than reducing the thickness of the entire structures. This localized modification reduces interference drag in the critical airflow region while preserving the overall structural strength of the wing and strut throughout the rest of their spans.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by creating thinned portions only in the necessary regions to reduce shockwave formation, rather than uniformly thinning the entire structures. The thinning is applied to the extent needed to reduce interference drag while stopping before compromising overall structural integrity, achieving the minimum necessary modification for drag reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively reduces shockwave strength and interference drag on the wing and strut, enhancing flight efficiency at transonic speeds by managing airflow and increasing the channel area.

Implementation Method 1

Under certain operating conditions, shockwaves can form within the channel between the struts and the wings. At transonic speeds, shockwaves generally cause an increase in the interference drag acting on the wings and struts.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave: Shock Wave

Implementation Method 2

Higher interference drag can lead to a lower flight efficiency of an aircraft.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS10556666B2Aircraft with strut-braced wing system
Publication Date: 2020.02.11 THE BOEING CO
  • US10556666B2 patent drawing
  • US10556666B2 patent drawing
  • US10556666B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is an aircraft that comprises a body, a wing, and a strut. The wing is coupled to and extends from the body. A strut inboard end portion is coupled to and extends from the body and a strut outboard end portion is coupled to and extends from an intermediate portion of the wing. The wing further comprises a first thinned portion adjacent the intermediate portion of the wing. An overall thickness of the first thinned portion of the wing decreases and increases in a spanwise direction along the wing. The strut further comprises a second thinned portion adjacent the outboard end portion of the strut. An overall thickness of the second thinned portion of the strut decreases and increases in a spanwise direction along the strut.