Substrate Container Support Structure for Stable Low-Friction Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing dimensions and weight of semiconductor substrates lead to instability in substrate containers, causing contamination risks and excessive adhesion issues during loading and unloading due to large friction areas with loading interfaces.

Innovation Solution

A substrate container design featuring a casing with ribs that form slots and a carrying plane for secure substrate placement, along with a detachable anti-slip tray with a textured guide surface to reduce friction, enhancing stability and ease of handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If substrate dimensions and weight increase, then substrate container dimensions and weight increase, but stability of the substrate container deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate container dimensionsVSAvoidsubstrate container stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is divided into multiple ribs (first rib, second rib, third rib, fourth rib) that are spaced apart to define slots. This segmentation provides distributed support points across the substrate container, improving stability without requiring a solid continuous structure that would add excessive weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Closing portions are added to connect the ribs, creating a three-dimensional rigid framework. The closing portions link the first rib to the second rib and the third rib to the fourth rib, forming a stable spatial structure that resists deformation and enhances overall container stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Weight of moving object

If substrate dimensions increase, then substrate weight increases, but likelihood of particle production during collision increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate weightVSAvoidparticle production
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The ribs and closing portions create a cushioning support structure that distributes collision forces across multiple contact points. This prevents concentrated impacts that would generate particles, by absorbing and dispersing the mechanical stress before it reaches the substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure provides different local characteristics: ribs provide linear support along edges, while closing portions provide point support at corners. This localized quality distribution optimizes protection against particle generation at critical stress points while maintaining overall substrate stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Area of stationary object

If friction area between substrate container and loading interface increases, then adhesion increases, but ease of loading and unloading deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefriction areaVSAvoidease of loading and unloading
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The tray is designed as a detachable component that can be separated from the substrate container. This extraction allows the tray to be removed independently, reducing the contact area between the container and loading interface during loading/unloading operations, thereby minimizing adhesion and friction effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure with ribs and closing portions creates a dynamic, lightweight framework that reduces the overall mass and contact pressure of the container. This dynamic design allows for easier manipulation during loading and unloading while maintaining structural integrity when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design improves substrate stability, reduces contamination risks, and facilitates easier loading and unloading by minimizing friction and adhesion, while maintaining secure substrate positioning.

Implementation Method 1

The guide surface has a texture formed thereon and is adapted for reducing friction between the guide surface and the restriction mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction reduction through surface texture: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20240006212A1Substrate container equipped with stabilizing support and smooth tray connection
Publication Date: 2024.01.04 GUDENG PRECISION IND CO LTD
  • US20240006212A1 patent drawing
  • US20240006212A1 patent drawing
  • US20240006212A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention discloses a substrate container which includes at least one support for substrates. The support has plural ribs distantly separated with each other. The ribs define multiple slots and a carrying plane for receiving a substrate. Each of the ribs has a front end and a rear end. Rear ends of two neighboring ones of the ribs are connected by a closing portion, so that the rear end of a slot defined by the two neighboring ones of the ribs is closed. The closing portion has a concave surface. The concave surface and the carrying plane define a clamping position for substrate confinement.