Substrate Counter-Electrode Layout for Compact Memory Cells

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of producing field effect devices with counter-electrodes, particularly in achieving compactness in memory cells, is increased due to the additional electrode, making it challenging to position transistors and optimize materials and dimensions effectively.

Innovation Solution

A substrate design featuring first and second counter-electrodes in the same plane on a support substrate, separated by an electrically insulating area, with a semi-conducting area facing each counter-electrode and an additional insulating material between the semi-conducting area and the support substrate, along with a method involving etching to form these structures, allowing for easier implementation and reduced complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a counter-electrode is added to field effect devices to reduce parasite effects, then the electrostatic control on conduction channel is improved, but the device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrostatic controlVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support substrate is designed to serve dual functions: as the structural foundation and as the counter-electrode. By making the support substrate conductive or sufficiently conductive, it acts as a quasi gate electrode, eliminating the need for a separate counter-electrode structure while maintaining electrostatic control over the conduction channel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The counter-electrode function is extracted from being a separate component and integrated into the support substrate itself. This extraction simplifies the overall device architecture by removing the need for additional electrode structures, insulating patterns, and associated manufacturing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of manufacture

If materials and dimensions are not optimized for counter-electrode architecture, then the implementation is simpler, but the counter-electrode cannot effectively modify device performances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoiddevice performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The electrical conductivity parameter of the support substrate is changed or optimized to achieve sufficient conductivity for counter-electrode functionality. By adjusting material composition, doping levels, or thickness parameters, the support substrate can effectively serve as a counter-electrode without requiring complex additional structures, thus maintaining ease of manufacture while improving device performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If transistors with counter-electrodes are used in memory cells to achieve compactness, then the electrostatic control is improved, but the positioning and layout complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrostatic controlVSAvoidlayout complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support substrate serves as both structural support and counter-electrode, eliminating the need for separate counter-electrode positioning and alignment. This multi-functionality simplifies the layout design and transistor positioning in memory cells while maintaining effective electrostatic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enables compact integration of multiple counter-electrodes with the active area, simplifying the production process and reducing complexity, while maintaining effective electrostatic control over the conduction channels, thus enhancing the performance and compactness of field effect devices.

Implementation Method 1

an electrically insulating material separating the semi-conducting area from the support substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical insulation: Dielectric

Implementation Method 2

a second electrode which presents an electrostatic effect on the conduction channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic effect: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS8674443B2Substrate provided with a semi-conducting area associated with two counter-electrodes and device comprising one such substrate
Publication Date: 2014.03.18 STMICROELECTRONICS (CROLLES 2) SAS
  • US8674443B2 patent drawing
  • US8674443B2 patent drawing
  • US8674443B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A support substrate comprises first and second counter-electrodes arranged in the same plane at the level of a surface of the support substrate. An electrically insulating area separates the first and second counter-electrodes. A semi-conducting area with first and second portions is separated from the support substrate by an electrically insulating material. The electrically insulating material is different from the material forming the support substrate. The first portion of the semi-conducting area is facing the first counter-electrode. The second portion of the semi-conducting area is facing the second counter-electrode.