Segmented Support Arm Locking With Friction-Layer Ball Joints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing adjustable support arms lack the ability to maintain configuration and position under forces and torques that alter their shape, and they often require increased exterior size, material, or applied force to lock configurations, limiting continuous three-dimensional adjustment.

Innovation Solution

An adjustable support arm featuring a plurality of segments connected by ball-and-socket joints with interleaved friction layers and a locking mechanism using a tension cable and resilient elements, allowing for bending and secure locking without increasing size or material, enabling continuous three-dimensional adjustment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If existing adjustable support arms use traditional locking mechanisms, then they can maintain configuration under forces and torques, but they require increased external forces or size to lock configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking strengthVSAvoidarm size
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The support arm is divided into multiple segments connected by ball-and-socket joints, each with interleaved friction layers. This segmentation allows the locking function to be distributed across multiple interfaces rather than requiring a single large locking mechanism, enabling effective locking without increasing overall arm size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Friction layers are introduced as intermediary elements between the ball and socket components. These friction layers mediate the locking action by providing friction-based resistance to motion, allowing the joint to maintain configuration under forces and torques without requiring traditional mechanical locks that would increase size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If existing adjustable support arms use traditional locking mechanisms, then they can lock configurations, but they require increased external forces to achieve locking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking strengthVSAvoidexternal force required
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The friction layers and resilient elements work together to create a self-locking mechanism. When the arm is positioned, the resilient elements automatically apply normal forces to the friction layers, generating locking forces without requiring additional external forces from the user. The system serves itself by converting positional energy into locking force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The friction characteristics and normal forces are dynamically adjusted based on the arm's configuration and loading conditions. The resilient elements automatically modify the contact pressure between friction layers according to the position and forces applied, optimizing locking strength without requiring increased external forcing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If existing adjustable support arms are designed for locking, then they can maintain position, but they limit continuous three-dimensional adjustment to discrete positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration stabilityVSAvoidcontinuous adjustment capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is designed to be dynamic rather than static. The friction layers and resilient elements continuously adapt to the arm's position and applied loads, providing stable locking at any configuration point in three-dimensional space. This allows continuous adjustment while maintaining stability, as the system can lock reliably at any position rather than only at predetermined discrete positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides enhanced strength against external forces and torques while maintaining configuration, allowing for continuous adjustment without discrete positions, and does so without increasing size or material usage, ensuring secure locking and adaptability.

Implementation Method 1

The friction layers and locking mechanism maintain the configuration of the arm when forces and torques that alter the shape of the arm are applied

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

the device includes a resilient element for applying tension to the cable

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9581190B2Adjustable support arm
Publication Date: 2017.02.28 SPHERESTEC
  • US9581190B2 patent drawing
  • US9581190B2 patent drawing
  • US9581190B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An adjustable support arm device includes a plurality of segments. Ball-and-socket joints each connect two adjacent segments. Each joint includes a plurality of interleaved friction layers between a ball and a socket of that joint. A locking mechanism applies a normal force to the friction layers to lock the joints, the mechanism being releasable to enable bending of the joints.