Suspension Arm Reinforcing Structure for Rigidity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Suspension arms in vehicle suspensions lack sufficient rigidity to effectively withstand inputs from road surfaces, affecting ride comfort, stability, and steering feeling.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an annular reinforcing member around the through-holes of the suspension arm attachment portions, formed via a burring process and bonded with adhesive, to enhance structural rigidity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the suspension arm uses a simple structure without additional reinforcing elements, then the manufacturing process is simple and cost is low, but the rigidity is insufficient to withstand road surface inputs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverigidityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by adding reinforcing members specifically at the attachment portions where rigidity is most needed, rather than uniformly reinforcing the entire suspension arm. The reinforcing members are positioned at the ends of the main body where connection to the vehicle body and knuckle occurs, providing targeted structural support exactly where road surface inputs are transmitted to the arm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining the base suspension arm material with reinforcing members made of different materials that provide enhanced rigidity. The reinforcing members are bonded to the main body using adhesive, creating a composite structure that leverages the strengths of both materials to achieve the required rigidity while maintaining reasonable weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If the suspension arm is designed with high rigidity to withstand road inputs, then ride comfort and stability improve, but the weight of the suspension arm increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverigidityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By concentrating the reinforcing members only at the attachment portions rather than throughout the entire suspension arm, the patent achieves the necessary rigidity improvement while minimizing the additional weight. This localized reinforcement approach ensures that material is added only where structurally necessary to withstand road surface inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The use of composite materials allows the patent to achieve high rigidity with relatively low additional weight. The reinforcing members are bonded to the main body using adhesive, creating a lightweight composite structure that provides enhanced stiffness without the weight penalty of solidifying the entire arm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If reinforcing members are added to the attachment portions, then the rigidity increases, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverigidityVSAvoidmanufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by forming recesses in the attachment portions before bonding the reinforcing members. These recesses are prepared in advance to receive the reinforcing members, ensuring proper positioning and alignment. This preliminary preparation simplifies the subsequent bonding process and ensures consistent quality without requiring complex assembly operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses adhesive as an intermediary substance to bond the reinforcing members to the main body. This intermediary material simplifies the manufacturing process by allowing the reinforcing members to be attached through a straightforward bonding operation rather than requiring mechanical fastening or welding, which would be more complex and time-consuming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The reinforcing structure significantly increases the suspension arm's rigidity, enabling it to better withstand road inputs and improve ride comfort, stability, and steering performance.

Implementation Method 1

bonding via an adhesive an annular reinforcing member to at least one of the pair of attachment portions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS10406880B2Reinforcing structure of suspension arm and method of manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2019.09.10 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10406880B2 patent drawing
  • US10406880B2 patent drawing
  • US10406880B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An object of the present invention is to provide a reinforcing structure of a suspension arm, in which high rigidity capable of withstanding any input from a road surface or the like can be given to the suspension arm. In a vehicle suspension including a plurality of suspension arms, one ends of which being connected to a vehicle body of a vehicle and the other ends of which being connected to a knuckle, a control arm includes a main body and a pair of attachment portions provided at both ends of the main body. Each of the pair of attachment portions is provided with a substantially cylindrical through-hole for connection to the vehicle body or the knuckle. At least one of the pair of attachment portions is provided with an annular reinforcing member for reinforcing around the through-hole.