Synchronous Transaction Framework State Persistence

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Contemporary synchronous transaction systems face challenges such as loss of intermediate transaction states during server outages, lack of visibility into transaction progress, inability to cancel in-flight transactions, and limited visibility into transaction history, especially due to system outages that disrupt communication with transaction handlers.

Innovation Solution

A synchronous transaction framework (STF) that captures and persists transaction states, allowing for rollback, resume, and cancellation of transactions, and provides visibility into transaction progress and history without requiring changes to existing code, by creating transaction objects that represent the transaction and persisting them in a system, enabling replay, rollback, and cancellation of transactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If synchronous transactions block until completion to ensure coordination, then transaction reliability is improved, but system responsiveness and user visibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction reliabilityVSAvoidtransaction completion time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by capturing and persisting transaction state information at key points during transaction execution. Transaction state capture modules record intermediate states before committing changes, enabling the system to maintain reliability while allowing the caller to continue executing without waiting for full transaction completion. This preliminary state preservation allows subsequent recovery or visibility operations to proceed independently of the original transaction blocking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If transaction states are persisted to enable recovery and visibility, then system reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the transaction management functionality into distinct modular components: transaction state capture modules that record specific state information, transaction objects that store persisted state data, and recovery modules that utilize the captured states. This segmentation allows each component to be independently implemented and maintained, reducing overall system complexity while enabling robust transaction recovery and visibility capabilities through coordinated interaction of specialized modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240152384A1Synchronous transaction enhanced capability
Publication Date: 2024.05.09 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20240152384A1 patent drawing
  • US20240152384A1 patent drawing
  • US20240152384A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an aspect, a computer-implemented method includes intercepting a call to invoke execution of a service as part of performing a synchronous transaction. A current state of the synchronous transaction is captured and persisted in a transaction object corresponding to the synchronous transaction. Execution of the service is invoked.