T7 RNA Polymerase Variants for High mRNA Capping Rates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mRNA production methods using wild-type RNA polymerase result in low capping rates, leading to waste of raw materials and increased production costs due to the need for column purification of uncapped RNA products, and potential safety concerns with promoter replacement.

Innovation Solution

Development of RNA polymerase variants with specific mutations at amino acid positions (R386, R34, K172, Y178, D388, Q435, N437, or D438) to enhance the capping rate during in-vitro transcription, allowing for higher utilization of cap analogs without requiring promoter replacement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If wild-type RNA polymerase is used for in-vitro transcription, then the transcription process is simple and safe, but the capping rate is low leading to waste of cap analogs and increased production costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapping rateVSAvoidcap analog utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by mutating specific amino acid residues in the RNA polymerase enzyme (such as R386, R34, K172, Y178, D388, Q435, N437, or D438 positions) to alter its catalytic properties. These parameter changes in the enzyme's structure enable it to achieve high capping rates (≥90%) while maintaining compatibility with the wild-type promoter sequence, thereby resolving the contradiction between manufacturing precision and substance loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If cap analogs are used with wild-type promoter, then the production process is simple, but the capping rate remains low requiring column purification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction process simplicityVSAvoidcapping rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the RNA polymerase enzyme parameters (amino acid sequence) rather than changing the promoter sequence, thereby maintaining the simplicity of the production process while achieving high capping rates. This approach avoids the need for promoter replacement and subsequent column purification steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If promoter replacement is performed to increase capping rate, then the capping rate may improve, but safety concerns and new impurities are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapping rateVSAvoidproduction safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes to the RNA polymerase enzyme instead of modifying the promoter sequence, thereby achieving high capping rates without altering the genetic template. This approach maintains production safety and avoids generating new impurities that would arise from promoter replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The modified RNA polymerase acts as an intermediary that bridges the gap between the wild-type promoter and high capping efficiency. The enzyme modification enables it to facilitate cap analog incorporation at high rates while leaving the promoter sequence unchanged, thus avoiding safety issues associated with promoter replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If wild-type RNA polymerase is used, then no enzyme modification is needed, but uncapped RNA products are wasted and require additional purification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenzyme modification complexityVSAvoidraw material utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies minimal parameter changes (specific amino acid mutations) to the RNA polymerase enzyme to achieve high capping rates. This modest modification complexity results in dramatically improved raw material utilization efficiency, eliminating the waste of uncapped RNA products and reducing purification requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The RNA polymerase variants increase the capping rate of mRNA products to at least 91-100%, reducing raw material waste and production costs while ensuring safety and efficiency in mRNA production.

Implementation Method 1

The RNA polymerase variants increase the capping rate of mRNA products to at least 91-100%

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzyme catalysis: Enzyme

Data Source

PatentUS20260103691A1RNA polymerase variant and use thereof
Publication Date: 2026.04.16 NANJING VAZYME BIOTECH CO LTD
  • US20260103691A1 patent drawing
  • US20260103691A1 patent drawing
  • US20260103691A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present application provides a class of T7 RNA polymerase variants and the use thereof, wherein the amino acid sequences of the T7 RNA polymerase variants comprise, relative to SEQ ID NO: 1, at least one substitution or deletion at amino acid positions selected from R34, K172, Y178, R386, D388, Q435, N437 or D438. The variants have improved catalytic activity relative to the wild-type T7 RNA polymerase, which can increase the capping rate of mRNA products during in-vitro transcription (co-transcriptional capping). In addition, the present application further provides a method for preparing RNA by using such variants. By adopting the method to prepare RNA molecules, more capped mRNAs can be obtained.