Tensegrity Robot Joint With Learning-Based Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current collaborative robotic systems face challenges with bulky robot arms that have poor haptic and ergonomic properties due to rigid links and rotary joints, leading to resistive forces and safety issues, while tensegrity structures offer promising characteristics but require advanced modeling and control to achieve effective dexterous end-effector manipulation.

Innovation Solution

A compact, low-inertia, and reduced-friction soft tensegrity robot joint with two degrees of freedom, combined with a high-level data-driven machine-learning-based controller using tendon length encoding and skin shape sensing for real-time closed-loop control, allowing for safe interaction and robustness against disturbances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional rigid links and rotary joints with motors and gearboxes are used, then the robot can provide sufficient force and structural stability, but the robot arms become bulky with high inertia and actuation friction, leading to poor haptic properties and safety issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce capabilityVSAvoidrobot arm mass and inertia
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional rotary joints with motors, gearboxes, and brakes with a tendon-driven tensegrity mechanism. This substitution eliminates heavy mechanical components while maintaining force capability through tension-based actuation, directly resolving the contradiction between strength and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes the motor, brake, harmonic drive, and gearbox from the joint structure. By taking out these heavy components and replacing them with tendon actuators and tension-based constraints, the robot arm achieves reduced mass and inertia while preserving force generation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Strength

If tendon preloading is applied to increase structural stiffness, then the robot can maintain shape and resist deformation, but axial compression on backbone links and contact joints increases, requiring larger pulling forces to drive robot motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stiffnessVSAvoidpulling force requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental actuation parameter from tendon preloading (compression-based) to active tendon tensioning (tension-based). This parameter change allows the system to achieve structural stiffness through controlled tension rather than passive preloading, eliminating the need to overcome axial compression forces during motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the conventional tendon actuation approach by using active tensioning instead of passive preloading. Rather than relying on preloaded tendons that create compressive forces, the system uses actively controlled tension to achieve both stiffness and motion, reversing the traditional force application method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Weight of moving object

If tensegrity structures are used to eliminate friction and reduce inertia, then the robot achieves compact size and low-inertia operation, but the system requires complex kinematics modeling and sophisticated actuation sensing with low tolerance to actuation errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot joint massVSAvoidkinematics modeling and sensing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through the learning-based controller that automatically adapts to the tensegrity joint's nonlinear dynamics. The system uses real-time sensing feedback and machine learning to compensate for modeling uncertainties and actuation errors, eliminating the need for complex manual kinematics modeling and sophisticated sensing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback through the learning-based controller that continuously monitors joint configuration and adjusts tendon actuation accordingly. This closed-loop control with machine learning compensates for the inherent sensitivity to actuation errors, reducing the complexity of kinematics modeling and sensing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If learning-based control with tendon length encoding and skin shape sensing is implemented, then the robot achieves precise path following and disturbance rejection, but the system requires sophisticated sensing and computational resources for real-time control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath following accuracyVSAvoidsensing and control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action through offline training of the learning-based controller using simulated physics data. By pre-training the neural network model with extensive simulation data before deployment, the system achieves precise path following and disturbance rejection without requiring complex real-time sensing and computation during actual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The tensegrity robot joint achieves precise path following with low RMSE and resistance to external disturbances, demonstrating improved manipulation repeatability and safety without preloading tendons, and can vary stiffness to handle varying loads and impulsive events.

Implementation Method 1

an outer elastic protection sheath configured to wrap on a cylindrical surface between the first and second inner structures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a central tendon connecting an apex of the first strut and an apex of the second strut such that the central tendon is in balance with the pulling forces exerted by the at least three actuation tendons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTension: Tension

Data Source

PatentUS20250018558A1Learning-based tensegrity robot joint
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG
  • US20250018558A1 patent drawing
  • US20250018558A1 patent drawing
  • US20250018558A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a tensegrity joint comprising: a first inner structure having a first frame and a first strut extending orthogonally from the first frame; a second inner structure having a second frame and a second strut extending orthogonally from the second frame; at least three actuation tendons, each being fixed at a respective hole at the first frame and being guided and allowed to slide through a respective hole at the second frame; a central tendon connecting an apex of the first strut and an apex of the second strut such that the central tendon is in balance with the pulling forces exerted by the at least three actuation tendons; and an outer elastic protection sheath configured to wrap on a cylindrical surface between the first and second inner structures.