Three-Leg Magnetic Core Layout for Low-Ripple Power Conversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional power conversion modules with single-stage conversion structures face challenges such as large size, high power loss, high AC current ripple, and low magnetic saturation capability, making them unsuitable for long-sized and high-density electronic devices.

Innovation Solution

A power conversion module with a magnetic device featuring a magnetic core assembly and windings arranged in a specific configuration, where the magnetic resistance of certain legs is optimized, and windings are partially overlapped to reduce AC current ripple and enhance magnetic saturation resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If a conventional single-stage conversion structure is used, then power conversion efficiency is improved, but the module size becomes large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower conversion efficiencyVSAvoidmodule size
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic core assembly is divided into multiple magnetic legs (first, second, third magnetic legs) with different magnetic resistances. The windings are segmented and disposed between different magnetic legs, creating modular functional units that can be independently optimized for performance while maintaining compact overall dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different magnetic legs are designed with different magnetic resistance characteristics. The first and third magnetic legs have greater magnetic resistance than the second magnetic leg, creating localized magnetic field distributions that optimize both power conversion efficiency and reduce the overall module size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional magnetic device structure is used, then manufacturing is simplified, but power loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidpower loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic core is segmented into multiple legs with different magnetic resistance properties. This segmentation allows for optimized magnetic flux distribution that reduces power loss while maintaining a structure that can be manufactured using conventional techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different magnetic legs have different magnetic resistance characteristics tailored to their specific functional requirements. This local optimization of magnetic properties reduces overall power loss in the magnetic device while keeping the manufacturing process relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If conventional magnetic device structure is used, then device complexity is reduced, but AC current ripple increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural complexityVSAvoidAC current ripple
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic core assembly is divided into multiple magnetic legs with different magnetic resistances. The windings are disposed between different magnetic legs, creating multiple magnetic flux paths that work together to reduce AC current ripple while maintaining manageable structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different magnetic legs have different magnetic resistance characteristics that are optimized to reduce AC current ripple. The first and third magnetic legs have greater magnetic resistance than the second magnetic leg, creating a magnetic flux distribution pattern that suppresses ripple currents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional magnetic device structure is used, then manufacturing is simplified, but magnetic saturation capability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidmagnetic saturation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic core is divided into multiple legs with different magnetic resistance properties. This segmentation creates multiple magnetic flux paths with different saturation characteristics, allowing the device to handle higher overall magnetic loads before saturation occurs while maintaining conventional manufacturing approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different magnetic legs have different magnetic resistance characteristics that optimize the magnetic flux distribution. This local optimization increases the overall magnetic saturation capability of the device while keeping the manufacturing process relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a compact, high-power-density module with reduced AC current ripple and improved magnetic saturation capability, suitable for long-sized and high-density applications like display cards or ASIC cards.

Implementation Method 1

A magnetic resistance of each of the first magnetic leg and the third magnetic leg is greater than a magnetic resistance of the second magnetic leg

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic resistance: Magnetic Reluctance

Implementation Method 2

The first secondary winding is disposed between the first magnetic leg and the second magnetic leg, and the second secondary winding is disposed between the second magnetic leg and the third magnetic leg

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

the capability of withstanding magnetic saturation is low

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic saturation: Magnetic Saturation

Data Source

PatentUS12009138B2Power device and magnetic device thereof
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 DELTA ELECTRONICS INC(CN)
  • US12009138B2 patent drawing
  • US12009138B2 patent drawing
  • US12009138B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A magnetic device includes a magnetic core assembly, a first secondary winding, a second secondary winding and a primary winding. The magnetic core assembly includes a first magnetic leg, a second magnetic leg and a third magnetic leg. The first to third magnetic legs are arranged in sequence. The second magnetic leg is disposed between the first magnetic leg and the third magnetic leg. The first secondary winding is disposed between the first magnetic leg and the second magnetic leg, and the second secondary winding is disposed between the second magnetic leg and the third magnetic leg. A first terminal of the primary winding is disposed between the first magnetic leg and the second magnetic leg, and a second terminal of the primary winding is disposed between the second magnetic leg and the third magnetic leg.