Threshing System Material Flow Adjustor for Crop Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional threshing and separating systems in agricultural combines face inefficiencies due to resistance forces created by transport vanes, which increase energy consumption and limit precise control over crop flow rates, often requiring more horsepower and offering only coarse adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A threshing system with a material flow adjustor that includes a rotor and a cylindrical cage, featuring a movably mounted material flow adjustor with a conveying edge that can adjust its radial distance and rotational direction to control axial movement of crop material, allowing for fine-tuned flow adjustments and reduced energy consumption by minimizing obstruction within the threshing space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If transport vanes are used to guide crop material through the threshing chamber, then crop flow control is achieved, but resistance forces increase energy consumption and reduce threshing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop flow controlVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes traditional transport vanes from the threshing chamber and replaces them with a rotor-mounted conveying system. The conveying elements are directly attached to the rotor, extracting the flow control function from separate vanes and integrating it into the rotor assembly, thereby eliminating the resistance forces that vanes create against the crop material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using stationary vanes to push crop material forward, the invention uses rotating conveying elements on the rotor that actively lift and carry material through the threshing chamber. This inverts the approach from passive guidance to active transport, reducing energy loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Device complexity

If transport vanes are positioned in fixed settings, then simple structure is maintained, but precise control over crop flow rate is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevane positioning systemVSAvoidcrop flow rate control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces fixed vanes with a dynamic rotor-mounted conveying system where the conveying elements rotate with the rotor. The flow control is achieved through variable rotor speed and adjustable conveying element positioning, transforming the static system into a dynamic one that can precisely control crop flow rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention enables continuous adjustment of crop flow rate by varying rotor speed and conveying element position, rather than relying on fixed vanes with limited settings. This allows precise control of material flow through parameter changes in the rotating system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple vanes with different inclination angles are provided to offer various flow rates, then flow rate options increase, but device complexity and number of control means double

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate optionsVSAvoidnumber of vanes and control means
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor-mounted conveying elements serve multiple functions: they convey crop material, control flow rate, and adapt to different crop types. A single rotating component replaces multiple fixed vanes, providing universal flow control through variable speed and position adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The dynamic rotating conveying system provides continuous flow rate adjustment through variable rotor speed, replacing the need for multiple fixed vanes with different inclination angles. This dynamic approach offers the same versatility with significantly reduced complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves improved energy efficiency and precise control over crop flow, reducing the energy required to move crop material through the threshing system while enabling infinite adjustment of flow rates, overcoming the limitations of traditional vanes by minimizing resistance and allowing for finer control.

Implementation Method 1

The rotor is configured to rotate relative to the cage about a first axis of rotation to axially convey material from the first end of the rotor toward the second end of the rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotational motion:

Implementation Method 2

The material flow adjustor is moveable between a first operative position, in which the at least one material conveying edge is spaced from the rotor in a radial direction by a first distance, and a second operative position in which the at least one material conveying edge is spaced from the rotor in the radial direction by a second distance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadial movement:

Data Source

PatentEP3348136B1Combine threshing system with crop flow control
Publication Date: 2019.10.02 CNH IND BELGIUM NV
  • EP3348136B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3348136B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3348136B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A threshing system for an agricultural harvester includes a rotor and a substantially cylindrical cage that surrounds at least a portion of the rotor. The threshing system also features a material flow adjustor for controlling axial movement of material through the cage. The material flow adjustor is movably mounted adjacent to a threshing space and includes at least one material conveying edge that enters the threshing space. The material flow adjustor is moveable between a first operative position, in which the at least one material conveying edge is spaced from the rotor in a radial direction by a first distance, and a second operative position in which the at least one material conveying edge is spaced from the rotor in the radial direction by a second distance, the second distance being less than the first distance.