Titanium Alloy Grain Refinement via High Strain Rate Forging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing titanium alloys with refined grain structures require multiple reheats, slow strain rates, and custom equipment, making them inefficient and time-consuming, especially for achieving ultrafine grain microstructures.

Innovation Solution

A method involving beta annealing followed by high strain rate multi-axis forging, where the workpiece is press forged at different orthogonal axes with strain rates of 0.2 s−1 to 0.8 s−1, allowing adiabatic heating and cooling to achieve a total strain of at least 1.0, which refines the grain size without the need for custom equipment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If ultra-slow strain rate multi-axis forging (0.001 s−1 or slower) is used to achieve ultrafine grain microstructure, then grain refinement is improved, but processing time becomes excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrain sizeVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the strain rate parameter from ultra-slow (0.001 s−1 or slower) to high (0.01 s−1 to 10 s−1), which fundamentally alters the deformation mechanism and enables grain refinement without excessive processing time. This parameter change allows the use of conventional equipment while achieving the desired microstructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic heating and cooling cycles during the forging process, where the workpiece is heated to maintain it in the beta phase field and then cooled to promote alpha phase formation. This periodic thermal action enables continuous dynamic recrystallization at high strain rates, achieving grain refinement without the time penalty of ultra-slow forging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple reheats and forging steps are used to produce fine grain microstructure, then grain size is reduced, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrain sizeVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary beta annealing to transform the microstructure to a beta phase before forging. This preliminary action ensures that the material is in the appropriate phase state to undergo dynamic recrystallization during high strain rate forging, eliminating the need for multiple intermediate reheats and forging steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous plastic deformation through high strain rate forging without interrupting for multiple reheats. The continuous deformation combined with periodic thermal cycles keeps the material in the dynamic recrystallization regime throughout the process, simplifying the overall process flow while achieving fine grain structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Manufacturing precision

If custom forging equipment is used to achieve ultra-slow strain rates, then ultrafine grain microstructure is achieved, but equipment cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrain sizeVSAvoidequipment requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the strain rate parameter from ultra-slow to high, which allows the use of conventional press forging equipment instead of custom-built ultra-slow strain rate equipment. This parameter change makes the process commercially viable by eliminating the need for specialized equipment while still achieving ultrafine grain structures through high strain rate dynamic recrystallization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If high strain rate (0.2 s−1 to 0.8 s−1) press forging is used, then processing time is reduced, but adiabatic heating occurs requiring thermal management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidworkpiece temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic heating and cooling cycles where the workpiece is heated to maintain it in the beta phase field before forging, then cooled to promote alpha phase formation after deformation. This periodic thermal management prevents excessive adiabatic heating while enabling high strain rate processing, and ensures the material remains in the appropriate phase state for grain refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes phase transitions between beta and alpha phases through controlled heating and cooling. By heating to the beta phase field before forging and cooling to the alpha+beta field after deformation, the process manages temperature-induced phase changes that would otherwise compromise the microstructure, enabling high strain rate processing without thermal damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process reduces processing time, eliminates the need for custom equipment, and achieves ultrafine grain structures efficiently, producing titanium alloys with refined grain sizes suitable for commercial production.

Implementation Method 1

press forging the workpiece at a workpiece forging temperature in a workpiece forging temperature range in the direction of a first orthogonal axis of the workpiece with a strain rate sufficient to adiabatically heat an internal region of the workpiece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdiabatic heating: Adiabatic Heating

Implementation Method 2

the adiabatically heated internal region of the workpiece is allowed to cool to a temperature at or near the workpiece forging temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS9624567B2Methods for processing titanium alloys
Publication Date: 2017.04.18 ATI PROPERTIES INC
  • US9624567B2 patent drawing
  • US9624567B2 patent drawing
  • US9624567B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of refining the grain size of a titanium alloy workpiece include beta annealing the workpiece, cooling the beta annealed workpiece to a temperature below the beta transus temperature of the titanium alloy, and high strain rate multi-axis forging the workpiece. High strain rate multi-axis forging is employed until a total strain of at least 1 is achieved in the titanium alloy workpiece, or until a total strain of at least 1 and up to 3.5 is achieved in the titanium alloy workpiece. The titanium alloy of the workpiece may comprise at least one of grain pinning alloying additions and beta stabilizing content effective to decrease alpha phase precipitation and growth kinetics.