Touch Sensor Multi-Press Command Input for Autonomous Cleaning Robots

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous cleaning devices lack a simple and intuitive way for users to issue spontaneous commands, leading to disruptive interactions and potential mapping errors due to collision detection misinterpretation.

Innovation Solution

Equipping cleaning devices with a touch sensor that triggers user commands upon multiple, rapid presses, distinguishing between collision detection and intentional user input.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the touch sensor is used for collision detection only, then the device can reliably detect obstacles, but the user cannot easily issue spontaneous commands without additional technology

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser control convenienceVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The touch sensor is designed to serve dual functions: collision detection and user command input. By detecting multiple rapid presses (n≥2) within a predetermined time period, the sensor distinguishes between accidental collisions and intentional user commands, enabling spontaneous control without requiring additional control devices or interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If the robot interprets all touch sensor signals as collision detection, then obstacle avoidance is maintained, but user commands cannot be recognized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser command recognitionVSAvoidcollision detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system distinguishes between collision signals and user commands by changing the parameter of press frequency. When the touch sensor is pressed n times (n≥2) within a predetermined time period, it is interpreted as a user command rather than a collision, allowing reliable differentiation between the two types of inputs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the user kicks the robot to signal it to leave the room, then the user can express displeasure, but the robot misinterprets it as an obstacle and creates mapping errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser expression capabilityVSAvoidmapping accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

By requiring multiple rapid presses (n≥2) within a predetermined time period, the system can distinguish between a user kick (single or slow press) and an intentional command to leave the room (multiple rapid presses). This prevents misinterpretation of kicks as obstacles while still allowing users to express their intent to discontinue cleaning in the current area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4410166B1Method for operating a mobile self-propelled device
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 BSH HAUSGERATE GMBH
  • EP4410166B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2B

AI summary

A method for operating a mobile, self-driving device (10), in particular a floor cleaning device, such as a vacuuming and/or sweeping and/or mopping robot, is described, wherein the mobile self-driving device (10) has at least one touch sensor (3) which is provided for detecting collisions of the mobile, self-driving device (10) with obstacles, and which, in addition to detecting collisions, triggers at least one user command when a user presses against the touch sensor (3) n times in a predetermined time period, where n>1.