Train Brake Backup Control via Valve Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electronic airbrake systems in locomotives fail to allow normal operation after failure of primary electronically controlled valves, preventing trains from continuing to operate until serviced and repaired, as existing failsafe systems do not enable default brake functionality.

Innovation Solution

An automatic brake backup control system that includes a pneumatic operating unit with a brake pipe control portion, electronically controlled valves, and an operating state control to switch between normal and backup operation modes, enabling continued operation of the train by activating independent brake controllers and backup valves.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If electronically controlled valves are used in the primary brake control system, then brake control precision and automation are improved, but system reliability deteriorates when valve failures occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake control automationVSAvoidsystem reliability after valve failure
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The brake control system is segmented into multiple independent valve groups (first and second electronically controlled charge valves, first and second electronically controlled vent valves) with separate control pathways. When one valve fails, the system can switch to using the other valves in the same group, maintaining operational capability and improving reliability after failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-configures backup valve arrangements and control pathways before any failure occurs. The operating state control is预先 programmed to automatically or manually switch between normal and backup valve configurations, ensuring that when a valve failure is detected, the system can immediately transition to an alternative configuration without loss of brake control functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If failsafe systems are implemented to stop train operation upon valve failure, then safety is improved, but operational continuity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidoperational continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The operating state control acts as an intermediary between the brake controller and the valve system, managing the transition between normal and backup valve configurations. This intermediary layer enables safe operation continuation by coordinating the switch to backup valves while maintaining proper brake control, thus preserving both safety and operational continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by switching between different valve configurations (normal vs. backup modes). When a valve failure occurs, the system modifies which valves are active and how they are controlled, allowing continued operation in a degraded but still safe and functional state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If backup valve systems are added to maintain operation after failure, then operational continuity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational continuityVSAvoidvalve system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The brake controller and operating state control are designed with multi-functionality, capable of managing both normal and backup valve configurations through the same control architecture. This universal control approach allows the system to handle multiple valve arrangements without proportionally increasing control system complexity, as the same controller adapts its operation based on the active configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the train to maintain default brake functionality even after primary valve failures, allowing continued operation and reducing downtime for maintenance.

Implementation Method 1

a first electronically controlled charge valve of the at least one electronically controlled valve including an input configured to be connected to the source of control pressure and an output connected to the equalizing reservoir control chamber, the first electronically controlled charge valve configured to: in a first state, permit air flow into the equalizing reservoir control chamber; and, in a second state, prevent air flow into the equalizing reservoir control chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir flow control through electronically controlled valve: Valve

Implementation Method 2

a first electronically controlled vent valve of the at least one electronically controlled valve including an input connected to the equalizing reservoir control chamber and an exhaust port connected to atmosphere, the first electronically controlled vent valve configured to: in a first state, prevent air flow out of the equalizing reservoir control chamber; and, in a second state, permit air flow out of the equalizing reservoir control chamber and vent air to atmosphere

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir flow control through electronically controlled valve: Valve

Implementation Method 3

a second electronically controlled charge valve of the at least one electronically controlled valve including an input connected to the source of control pressure and an output connected to the equalizing reservoir control chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir flow control through electronically controlled valve: Valve

Implementation Method 4

a second electronically controlled vent valve of the at least one electronically controlled valve including an input connected to the equalizing reservoir control chamber and an exhaust port open to atmosphere

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir flow control through electronically controlled valve: Valve

Implementation Method 5

an equalizing reservoir control chamber configured to control air pressure of the brake pipe

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir pressure control:

Data Source

PatentUS10315637B2Automatic brake backup control system and method
Publication Date: 2019.06.11 WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECH CORP
  • US10315637B2 patent drawing
  • US10315637B2 patent drawing
  • US10315637B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is an automatic brake backup control system and method for a train equipped with an electronic airbrake system and including at least one locomotive, a brake pipe, a source of control pressure, and at least one brake. The system includes a pneumatic operating unit that includes a brake pipe control portion. The brake pipe control portion includes a primary passage network, a control passage network, and an equalizing reservoir control chamber configured to control air pressure of the brake pipe. The brake pipe control portion also includes a first and second electronically controlled charge valve, and a first and second electronically controlled vent valve. The brake pipe control portion further includes an operating state control configured to switch operation of the at least one locomotive between a normal operation mode and a backup operation mode in response to an input by an operator.