Transport Comparison Platform for Route Progress Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users of trip planning applications are unable to make informed decisions about transport modes or routes due to discrepancies between predicted and actual travel times, as these applications do not account for unexpected events or factors like accidents and bad weather, limiting their ability to choose optimal routes in the future.

Innovation Solution

A system that compares progress information of different transport modes or routes by determining and presenting actual travel data, allowing users to assess which route was the best choice based on performance criteria such as time, distance, and convenience, using location information and simulation to provide real-time or retroactive data for informed decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If trip planning applications present predicted travel times for multiple transport modes, then users can compare options before starting a trip, but actual travel times differ from predicted times due to unexpected events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of travel time informationVSAvoidlack of actual travel time data for decision-making
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system collects actual travel time data from users who have completed trips and feeds this information back to improve future predictions. The server receives location information from mobile devices, determines actual travel times, and uses this feedback to refine predicted travel times for route planning applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting and analyzing travel time data from multiple users before providing route recommendations. It proactively determines predicted travel times based on cumulative data from previous trips, allowing users to make informed decisions before starting their journey.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the system collects and processes location information from multiple devices to determine actual travel times, then more accurate predictions can be made, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of travel time dataVSAvoidcomplexity of data collection and processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Mobile devices automatically perform self-service by determining their own location information using onboard sensors and GPS. The devices autonomously track travel progress and report data to the server without requiring manual intervention or complex processing at the device level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The server performs multiple functions using a unified approach: it collects location data from multiple devices, determines actual travel times, stores cumulative data, and generates predicted travel times. This multi-functional design simplifies the overall system architecture by consolidating processing tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If users are limited to knowing only the actual travel time of the transport mode taken, then the system is simple to operate, but users cannot make well-informed decisions for future transport mode or route selections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of user interfaceVSAvoidinsufficient information for future decision-making
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system adds another dimension to travel time information by providing comparative data across multiple transport modes and routes. Instead of showing only a single actual travel time, the system presents predicted times for alternative options and actual times from previous trips, enabling users to evaluate choices from multiple perspectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The information is segmented into distinct components: predicted travel times for different transport modes, actual travel times from completed trips, and comparative performance data. This segmentation allows users to systematically evaluate each option's strengths and weaknesses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9857185B2Method and apparatus for presenting a comparison of progress information associated with transport modes or routes
Publication Date: 2018.01.02 HERE GLOBAL BV
  • US9857185B2 patent drawing
  • US9857185B2 patent drawing
  • US9857185B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach for presenting a comparison of progress information associated with transport modes, routes, or a combination thereof is described. A transport comparison platform determines progress information for at least one device associated with at least one mode of transport, at least one route, or a combination thereof. The transport comparison platform determines other progress information associated with at least another mode of transport, at least another route, or a combination thereof. The transport comparison platform causes, at least in part, a presentation of a comparison of the progress information against the other progress information.