Autonomous Transport Corridor Control for Obstacle-Aware Navigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomously moving transport systems face inefficiencies due to inflexible environmental sensors that lead to emergency stops or slowed travel in response to immobile and dynamically changing environments, limiting their productivity and safety.

Innovation Solution

The system divides the monitored zone into a travel corridor and one or more secondary corridors, allowing adaptive adjustment of travel parameters such as speed and steering based on object location and movement, enabling efficient navigation without collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If environmental sensors monitor protective fields to ensure safety, then safety is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to emergency stops and slowed travel

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitored zone is divided into multiple zones (first monitored zone, second monitored zone, third monitored zone) with different safety requirements. Objects in the first monitored zone (direct travel path) trigger emergency stops, while objects in the second and third zones (peripheral areas) trigger speed reductions or route adaptations, allowing the system to maintain safety while reducing unnecessary stops and maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adapts travel parameters dynamically based on object location. Instead of a binary stop/go response, the system adjusts speed, steering angle, and acceleration differently depending on which monitored zone contains the detected object, enabling flexible response that maintains both safety and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If protective fields are switched to respond to different environments, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases due to cumbersome switching

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic zone assignment where the monitored zones and their associated response strategies are continuously adapted based on vehicle movement and environment. The control apparatus automatically adjusts which zone corresponds to which response level without requiring manual reconfiguration or complex switching mechanisms, achieving high adaptability with simplified control logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250208628A1Autonomously moving transport system and a method for operating such an autonomously moving transport system
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 SICK AG
  • US20250208628A1 patent drawing
  • US20250208628A1 patent drawing
  • US20250208628A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomously moving transport system comprising a control apparatus, an obstacle recognition device and a drive unit, wherein the drive unit is configured to move the autonomously moving transport system along a travel route with a specific travel parameter. The obstacle recognition device is configured to detect an object in a monitored zone and to transmit corresponding object information to the control apparatus. The control apparatus is configured to divide the monitored zone into a travel corridor and at least one first secondary corridor. The control apparatus is configured to determine, based on the object information, whether the detected object is located in the travel corridor or in the at least one first secondary corridor. The control apparatus is configured to adapt a travel parameter differently when the object is in the first secondary corridor than when the object is located in the travel corridor.