Transverse Shock Absorber Module for Offset Impact Energy Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current shock absorption modules in motor vehicles are inefficient in distributing impact force evenly during oblique or offset impacts, leading to suboptimal energy absorption, as the absorbers are primarily designed for axial forces and lack effective coupling between beams.

Innovation Solution

A shock absorption module with a transverse shock absorber that bears directly on a crossmember and plates, optimizing energy absorption by positioning the incompressible crosspiece between the impact point and the spar, allowing the absorber to fully utilize its absorption function and increasing the effective surface area for impact energy absorption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If absorbers are positioned only in the extension of the longerons (crash box type), then the module is simpler in structure, but the energy absorption is insufficient during oblique or offset impacts because the absorbers cannot transfer oblique forces effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidenergy absorption efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a transverse dimension to the absorber arrangement by positioning absorbers at the ends of a transverse beam perpendicular to the longitudinal members. This dimensional change allows the system to handle oblique and offset impacts effectively, as the transverse beam can transfer forces from multiple directions to the longitudinal members, resolving the contradiction between structural simplicity and energy absorption efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If the crosspiece is rigid and incompressible, then it maintains spacing between side members effectively, but it transfers impact energy directly to the spar without absorption, reducing overall energy absorption capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespacing maintenanceVSAvoidenergy absorption capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the structural system into distinct functional components: the transverse beam maintains spacing between longitudinal members, while separate absorbers positioned at the ends of the transverse beam handle energy absorption. This segmentation allows each component to optimize its specific function without compromising the other, resolving the contradiction between maintaining structural spacing and absorbing impact energy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If absorbers are positioned to bear on the crosspiece, then the coupling between beams is improved, but the effective surface area for impact energy absorption is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam couplingVSAvoideffective surface area for absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the transverse beam as an intermediary element that connects the longitudinal members and provides mounting points for absorbers. The absorbers bear on the transverse beam rather than directly on the longitudinal members, which maintains reliable beam coupling while the broader transverse beam structure preserves effective surface area for impact energy absorption. The intermediary transverse beam resolves the contradiction between coupling reliability and absorption surface area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances the module's ability to absorb impact energy, providing greater protection and reducing the risk of energy transfer to the spar, while maintaining the spacing between side members during impacts, thus improving overall shock energy absorption efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The energy absorption is done by longitudinal compression (also called by 'botellement' of these absorbers)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

shock absorption module making it possible in particular to prevent, during an insurance shock, the deformation of the side members

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Data Source

PatentEP3320223B1Bumper module for an automotive vehicle
Publication Date: 2019.06.26 COMPAGNIE PLASTIC OMNIUM SA
  • EP3320223B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3320223B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP3320223B1 patent drawingFigure 6A~6D

AI summary

The invention relates to a shock-absorbing module (1) intended for being arranged on the side rails (2) of a motor vehicle, the module (1) including at least one shock absorber (3), a crossmember (5) extending in a transverse direction of the vehicle, and two plates (4) suitable for being added directly onto the front or rear surface of the side rails (2), characterised in that: the shock absorber (3) extends in a transverse direction of the vehicle, and rests directly on the crossmember (5); each side end of the shock absorber (3) rests directly on a first area (6) of one of the plates (4); and each side end of the crossmember (5) rests directly on a second area (7) of one of the plates (4) and/or rests directly on an area (7') of the side rails (2).