Aircraft Trigger Brake With Roller Jamming Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current braking devices in aircraft actuator systems experience undesirable drag due to multiple static and dynamic friction plates, which increase the burden on the power drive unit and transmission system, especially at low operational temperatures.

Innovation Solution

A selectively operable trigger brake with a preloaded torsion spring and a roller jamming mechanism that allows limited rotational movement between the trigger brake and input shaft, utilizing a solenoid actuator to engage static and rotary braking elements and activate the roller jamming mechanism upon exceeding a predetermined rotational threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple static and dynamic friction plates are used in the brake, then the braking effectiveness is improved, but the drag on the actuator system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking effectivenessVSAvoiddrag
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The brake employs a dynamic plate that rotates with the input shaft and a static plate, where the relative motion between them creates the braking effect only when needed. The dynamic configuration allows the brake to engage selectively without continuous drag, resolving the contradiction between braking effectiveness and energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The brake operates periodically rather than continuously, engaging only when braking is required and disengaging during normal operation. This periodic action eliminates continuous drag while maintaining effective braking capability when activated, addressing the contradiction between reliable braking and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Reliability

If the brake is fully effective as a braking mechanism, then the braking performance is improved, but the drag particularly at low operational temperatures increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking performanceVSAvoiddrag at low temperatures
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The brake utilizes changes in operational parameters such as temperature and rotational speed to modulate its effectiveness. At low temperatures, the brake maintains full braking capability when engaged while minimizing drag during non-braking conditions, adapting to environmental conditions to resolve the contradiction between performance and energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the brake provides continuous drag on the actuator system, then the braking readiness is improved, but the burden on the power drive unit and transmission system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking readinessVSAvoidburden on power drive unit
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The brake is pre-positioned and ready for immediate engagement without requiring continuous application of braking force. The mechanical configuration allows the brake to be primed and responsive while minimizing the burden on the power drive unit during normal operation, resolving the contradiction between braking readiness and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution minimizes drag by using a compact design that reduces the power absorbed by the brake unit, allowing for a less powerful and lighter power drive unit, while ensuring rapid activation to stop actuator systems in case of faults, thus maintaining symmetric deployment of aircraft components.

Implementation Method 1

a preloaded torsion spring rotationally coupled to the input shaft but permitting a limited rotational movement between the trigger brake and the input shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorsion spring: Torsion Spring

Implementation Method 2

a roller jamming mechanism operable upon the relative rotation between the trigger brake and the input shaft exceeding a predetermined amount to stop rotation of the input shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10900526B2Braking device
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 GOODRICH ACTUATION SYST
  • US10900526B2 patent drawing
  • US10900526B2 patent drawing
  • US10900526B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A brake device for braking rotation of an input shaft, comprises a selectively operable trigger brake comprising a preloaded torsion spring rotationally coupled to the input shaft but permitting a limited rotational movement between the trigger brake and the input shaft; and a roller jamming mechanism operable upon the relative rotation between the trigger brake and the input shaft exceeding a predetermined amount to stop rotation of the input shaft upon operation of the trigger brake.