Trip Optimization Tool for ETA and PTA Calculation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current transportation management systems lack comprehensive tools for drivers to plan trips efficiently, including optimal routes and non-work stops like fuel and rest stops, leading to increased costs, regulatory violations, and driver turnover.

Innovation Solution

A transportation management system that includes trip optimization tools generating comprehensive and optimized trip plans, considering driver and dispatcher inputs, vehicle resources, and regulatory requirements, providing viable alternatives for non-work stops and real-time updates to ensure compliance and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If individual trip planning is left completely up to the driver relying on driver's experience and capabilities, then driver autonomy and ease of operation are improved, but trip planning accuracy and regulatory compliance deteriorate due to inexperience leading to higher fuel costs, insufficient driving hours of service, and unsafe parking locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver autonomyVSAvoidtrip planning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a trip planning assistance system that acts as an intermediary between the driver and the trip planning process. The system provides automated suggestions for fuel stops, rest stops, and route optimization while allowing the driver to maintain final decision-making authority. This mediator approach enables drivers with varying experience levels to achieve accurate, compliant trip plans without completely removing driver autonomy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables drivers to self-serve by providing them with automated trip planning tools that calculate optimal routes, fuel stops, and rest breaks based on real-time data. Drivers can review and adjust suggestions according to their preferences and local knowledge, combining automated accuracy with personal autonomy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of energy

If the back office uses third party fuel optimization tools to identify optimal fuel plan, then fuel cost efficiency is improved, but route path accuracy and overall trip optimization deteriorate because the fuel plan may not accurately reflect the optimal route path for the vehicle and load at the time it is meant to be run

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel cost efficiencyVSAvoidroute path accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges fuel optimization functionality with comprehensive trip planning into a single integrated system. Rather than using separate third-party fuel tools, the system combines route optimization, fuel stop planning, rest break scheduling, and regulatory compliance checking into one unified platform that considers all factors simultaneously to determine the truly optimal trip plan.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The trip planning system is designed as a universal platform that handles multiple functions: route optimization, fuel consumption calculation, rest stop scheduling, regulatory compliance monitoring, and real-time adjustments. This multi-functional approach ensures that fuel efficiency is optimized in conjunction with overall trip requirements rather than in isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If flat hour additions are used to estimate rest stops for longer routes, then regulatory compliance is improved by providing an educated guess, but trip plan precision and driver productivity deteriorate because the driver is still responsible for figuring out where and when to take rest stops on their own without optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidtrip plan precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically calculating and scheduling rest stops as part of the initial trip plan generation. Rather than simply adding flat hour estimates, the system proactively identifies optimal rest stop locations, times, and durations based on driver hours of service regulations, route characteristics, and real-time conditions, providing a complete and precise trip plan before the driver begins their journey.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive trip optimization tools are implemented to generate optimized trip plans with ETA and PTA calculations, then trip planning accuracy and resource utilization are improved, but system complexity and implementation cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrip planning accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the comprehensive trip optimization system into modular functional components: route planning module, fuel optimization module, rest stop scheduling module, ETA/PTA calculation module, and compliance monitoring module. Each module handles a specific aspect of trip planning and can operate independently or in combination, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive optimization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20180080776A1System for planning trips with estimated time of arrival (ETA) and projected time of availability (PTA) calculated for each stop
Publication Date: 2018.03.22 TRIMBLE INC
  • US20180080776A1 patent drawing
  • US20180080776A1 patent drawing
  • US20180080776A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A transportation management system that includes tools for generating an optimized trip plan that can be updated, such as based on driver input, during implementation of a planned trip. The system includes a comprehensive trip optimization tool that generates a trip plan with fuel stop and rest stop optimization. The system includes tools calculating estimated time of arrival (ETA) and projected time of availability (PTA) for the driver, and these tools are adapted to provide the ETA and PTA for the entire trip (rather than only providing an ETA for the next stop). The system further includes tools accepting driver input and/or allowing driver manipulation of a dispatched trip plan such as using pre-filtered alternatives for fuel stops or rest stops or routes, e.g., based on stored driver preferences, that may be less optimal than those in the original trip plan but still viable.