Trip Optimization Tool Integrating HOS Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current transportation management systems lack comprehensive tools for drivers to plan trips efficiently, including optimal routes and non-work stops like fuel and rest stops, leading to increased costs, regulatory violations, and driver turnover.

Innovation Solution

A transportation management system that generates optimized trip plans with integrated tools for calculating estimated time of arrival and projected time of availability, allowing driver input and manipulation of trip plans, including recommendations for fuel, rest, and maintenance stops, while ensuring compliance with regulations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If drivers plan trips independently using their own experience, then driver autonomy is maintained, but trip planning accuracy and regulatory compliance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver autonomyVSAvoidtrip planning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a trip planning system that acts as an intermediary between regulatory requirements and driver operations. The system processes regulatory HOS rules and driver preferences to generate optimized trip plans, mediating between the need for compliance and driver autonomy without requiring direct driver expertise in regulatory interpretation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables drivers to self-serve by allowing them to input their own preferences and requirements into the trip planning tool. Drivers can review and modify suggested trip plans independently, maintaining autonomy while benefiting from automated compliance checking and optimization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of energy

If carriers use third-party fuel optimization tools, then fuel costs are reduced, but navigation route alignment and rest stop planning deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidtrip planning integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple previously separate functions into a single integrated trip planning system. Fuel optimization, HOS compliance checking, rest stop scheduling, and navigation route alignment are combined into one unified tool that processes all these requirements simultaneously, eliminating the need for separate third-party tools and manual coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The trip planning system is designed as a universal tool that handles multiple functions: fuel optimization, regulatory compliance, rest stop planning, and navigation integration. This multi-functional approach replaces the need for multiple specialized tools and simplifies the overall trip planning process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If flat hour additions are used for rest stops, then regulatory compliance is simplified, but trip plan viability accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance calculationVSAvoidtrip plan viability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system moves from fixed parameter estimates (flat hour additions) to dynamic parameter calculations based on actual trip conditions. Rest stop durations and locations are determined by processing real-time data including driver fatigue levels, route characteristics, and regulatory requirements, rather than applying standardized time additions to all trips.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If drivers manually re-plan trips during delays, then adaptability is maintained, but productivity and time efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrip plan flexibilityVSAvoidtrip re-planning efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The trip planning system incorporates continuous feedback mechanisms that monitor actual trip progress against the planned itinerary. When delays or exceptions occur, the system automatically receives feedback data and recalculates optimized trip plans in real-time, providing drivers with updated routing recommendations without requiring manual re-planning efforts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10260893B2System for integrating hours of service (HOS) with a vehicle's navigation system
Publication Date: 2019.04.16 TRIMBLE INC
  • US10260893B2 patent drawing
  • US10260893B2 patent drawing
  • US10260893B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A transportation management system that includes tools for generating an optimized trip plan that can be updated, such as based on driver input, during implementation of a planned trip. The system includes a comprehensive trip optimization tool that generates a trip plan with fuel stop and rest stop optimization. The system includes tools calculating estimated time of arrival (ETA) and projected time of availability (PTA) for the driver, and these tools are adapted to provide the ETA and PTA for the entire trip (rather than only providing an ETA for the next stop). The system further includes tools accepting driver input and/or allowing driver manipulation of a dispatched trip plan such as using pre-filtered alternatives for fuel stops or rest stops or routes, e.g., based on stored driver preferences, that may be less optimal than those in the original trip plan but still viable.