In-Line Shoulder Joint Architecture for Trocar-Ready Surgical Robotics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current robotic surgical systems for minimally invasive procedures, such as the Da Vinci system, are costly, require extensive training, and have a large footprint, making them unsuitable for smaller hospitals and limiting accessibility due to their complex nature and high dexterity requirements.

Innovation Solution

A single-armed robotic device with an in-line shoulder joint design that allows for compactness and ease of insertion through standard trocar ports, featuring a differential yoke and nested driveshafts to minimize cross-sectional diameter and facilitate three degrees of freedom, enabling independent positioning and reduced complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a traditional robotic surgical system like Da Vinci is used, then surgical functionality and dexterity are improved, but system cost, complexity, and footprint increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical dexterityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies nesting by placing the second driveshaft inside the first driveshaft, and the shoulder joint components inside the elongate device bodies. This nested configuration allows multiple functional components to occupy the same spatial envelope, reducing the overall system footprint and complexity while maintaining multiple degrees of freedom for surgical dexterity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system is segmented into modular components: elongate device bodies, driveshafts, bevel gears, and shoulder joints that can be independently positioned and controlled. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized separately and assembled in a compact configuration, reducing overall system complexity while preserving surgical functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a traditional robotic system with large footprint is used, then surgical capability is maintained, but accessibility to smaller hospitals and operating rooms is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical capabilityVSAvoidsystem footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The nested configuration of driveshafts and joint components within the elongate device bodies dramatically reduces the spatial footprint of the robotic system. The second driveshaft is positioned within the first driveshaft, and the shoulder joint is contained within the second elongate device body, allowing the entire system to occupy minimal operating room space while maintaining full surgical capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the longitudinal dimension of the elongate device bodies to accommodate multiple components along the length rather than spreading them out in planar space. The driveshafts and joints are arranged axially within the elongated structure, transforming a two-dimensional footprint problem into a three-dimensional space-efficient configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If complex robotic systems are deployed, then surgical precision is improved, but training requirements and operational difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical precisionVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the mechanical parameters of the system by using bevel gears to convert rotational motion from the driveshafts into precise angular movements of the shoulder joint. This mechanical parameter transformation provides precise control over the arm's position and orientation while using straightforward rotational actuation, reducing operational complexity while maintaining surgical precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-affected harmful factors

If standard trocar ports are used for insertion, then minimally invasive access is achieved, but the robotic device must have very compact cross-sectional dimensions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveminimally invasive benefitVSAvoiddevice cross-sectional volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The nested configuration of the second driveshaft within the first driveshaft, and the shoulder joint components within the second elongate device body, minimizes the cross-sectional dimensions of the robotic arm. This allows the entire robotic system to pass through standard trocar ports while maintaining all necessary functional components for minimally invasive surgery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS11013564B2Single-arm robotic device with compact joint design and related systems and methods
Publication Date: 2021.05.25 BOARD OF RGT UNIV OF NEBRASKA
  • US11013564B2 patent drawing
  • US11013564B2 patent drawing
  • US11013564B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are various robotic surgical devices and systems that include first and second elongate bodies, first and second driveshafts disposed through the second elongate body, and an in-line shoulder joint with a robotic arm coupled thereto. In certain implementations, the in-line shoulder joint has a differential yoke and a dual shaft disposed within the yoke lumen.