Selective Tungsten Etching via Chlorine-Methane Plasma

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current etching processes for tungsten-containing materials face challenges such as low etch rates, high temperatures, and difficulty in removing tungsten oxide and tungsten metal from high aspect ratio trenches without damaging inter-layer dielectric materials, leading to prolonged processing times and potential thermal budget exceedance.

Innovation Solution

The method involves flowing chlorine-containing and hydrocarbon precursors into a semiconductor processing chamber to form a plasma, which selectively etches tungsten-containing materials at low temperatures, achieving high etch rates and selectivity over silicon-containing materials, while maintaining minimal residue and preserving substrate features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If wet HF etch is used to remove tungsten-containing materials, then the etching process is simple and cost-effective, but the etch rate is slow and it cannot penetrate constrained trenches effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetching process simplicityVSAvoidetch rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces wet chemical etching with a plasma-based etching process that uses reactive ion bombardment and chemical reactions to remove tungsten-containing materials. The plasma process provides both chemical reactivity and physical sputtering effects, achieving high etch rates while maintaining anisotropic etching profiles that can penetrate constrained trenches effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs specific plasma process parameters including chlorine-containing precursors (Cl2, BCl3), hydrocarbon precursors (CH4, C2H6), radio frequency power (10-1000W), and pressure control (1-100 mTorr) to optimize the etching reaction. These parameter changes enable selective removal of tungsten oxide and tungsten metal at controlled rates while protecting underlying structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If high power plasma is used to increase etch rate, then productivity improves, but substrate damage from electric arcs increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetch rateVSAvoidsubstrate damage from electric arcs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes plasma process parameters by using moderate power levels (10-1000W radio frequency power) combined with specific precursor ratios and pressure conditions (1-100 mTorr). This parameter optimization maintains high etch rates while preventing electric arc formation that would cause substrate damage. The use of chlorine-containing and hydrocarbon precursors at controlled flow rates further stabilizes the plasma process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses chlorine-containing precursors (Cl2, BCl3) and hydrocarbon precursors (CH4, C2H6) as intermediary substances that facilitate the etching reaction through controlled chemical pathways. These intermediaries react with tungsten-containing materials to form volatile products that can be removed, providing high etch rates without requiring high power plasma that would cause substrate damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If high temperature processing is used to remove tungsten oxide, then etching efficiency improves, but thermal budget constraints are exceeded and inter-layer dielectric materials are damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetching efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces thermal-based removal processes with plasma-based etching that operates at lower temperatures. The plasma process uses reactive species and ion bombardment to chemically react with and physically remove tungsten-containing materials, achieving high etching efficiency without the high temperatures that would damage inter-layer dielectric materials or exceed thermal budget constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs specific plasma process parameters including radio frequency power (10-1000W), pressure (1-100 mTorr), and precursor flow rates to enable efficient tungsten oxide and tungsten metal removal at low temperatures. The use of chlorine-containing and hydrocarbon precursors creates highly reactive plasma species that enhance etching efficiency without requiring thermal activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If selective etching of tungsten over silicon is required, then pattern transfer precision improves, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern transfer selectivityVSAvoidetch process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves high selectivity for tungsten-containing materials over silicon-containing materials through optimized plasma process parameters. By controlling precursor composition (chlorine-containing and hydrocarbon precursors), power levels (10-1000W), and pressure (1-100 mTorr), the process selectively removes tungsten oxide and tungsten metal while leaving silicon-based inter-layer dielectric materials intact. The selectivity ratio of tungsten to silicon etching exceeds 100:1, enabling precise pattern transfer without complex process steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient removal of tungsten-containing materials at lower temperatures with high selectivity, reducing processing time and thermal budget constraints, and ensuring complete removal with minimal residue, thus improving semiconductor device fabrication.

Implementation Method 1

forming a plasma from the chlorine-containing precursor and the methane to produce plasma effluents

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma: Plasma

Implementation Method 2

The plasma effluents may produce an oxychloride of tungsten

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS10256112B1Selective tungsten removal
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US10256112B1 patent drawing
  • US10256112B1 patent drawing
  • US10256112B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Exemplary methods for removing tungsten-containing material may include flowing a chlorine-containing precursor into a processing region of a semiconductor processing chamber. The methods may also include flowing methane into the processing region of the semiconductor processing chamber. The methods may include forming a plasma from the chlorine-containing precursor and the methane to produce plasma effluents. The methods may also include contacting a substrate with the plasma effluents. The substrate may include an exposed region of a tungsten-containing material. The plasma effluents may produce an oxychloride of tungsten. The methods may also include recessing the exposed region of the tungsten-containing material.