Turning Control System Feedback Vibration Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing turning control systems fail to effectively convey road-surface state information to drivers, potentially leading to reduced driver awareness and stability issues during vehicle operation.

Innovation Solution

A turning control system that includes an electronic control unit, which calculates and adjusts the steering operation amount and angle operation amount to reflect road-surface state information, allowing for feedback control and correction to maintain optimal steering torque and angle, thereby informing the driver of road conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If feedback control is applied to control turning angle to target turning angle, then reverse input vibration from turning wheels is suppressed, but driver awareness of road-surface state information is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering control stabilityVSAvoidroad-surface state information
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial feedback control by selectively suppressing only the reverse input vibration component while preserving the road-surface state information component. The control system calculates the degree of vibration and applies feedback control only when vibration exceeds a threshold, rather than continuously suppressing all feedback. This partial application of feedback control resolves the contradiction by maintaining stability when needed while preserving driver awareness under normal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the feedback control gain based on the calculated degree of vibration and vehicle speed. The control system continuously monitors vibration levels and modifies the suppression intensity accordingly, transitioning between different control states. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to maintain stability during high-vibration conditions while preserving road-surface information during normal operation, resolving the static contradiction through adaptive behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of information

If the magnitude of subtracted value is increased to enhance driver awareness of road information, then steering control stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroad-surface state informationVSAvoidsteering control stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of feedback control gain based on vibration degree and vehicle speed. By adjusting this parameter dynamically, the system optimizes the balance between preserving road-surface information and maintaining steering stability. The gain parameter is increased to preserve information when vibration is low, and decreased to maintain stability when vibration is high, resolving the contradiction through parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different levels of feedback control to different operating conditions. Instead of uniform suppression, the system applies localized control strategies: minimal suppression during normal operation to preserve road information, and enhanced suppression during high-vibration conditions to maintain stability. This localized quality approach resolves the contradiction by tailoring the control intensity to specific operational contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If feedback control continuously suppresses reverse input vibration, then steering stability is improved, but driver ability to perceive road conditions is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering control reliabilityVSAvoiddriver perception capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback control selectively based on measured vibration levels. The system continuously monitors the degree of reverse input vibration and applies feedback suppression only when necessary, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to actual conditions. This feedback mechanism resolves the contradiction by maintaining reliability when vibration problems occur while preserving driver perception capability during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent calculates the degree of vibration in advance and prepares appropriate control responses before vibration becomes problematic. By predicting vibration trends and pre-adjusting control parameters, the system prevents excessive vibration while minimizing unnecessary suppression of road-surface information. This preliminary anti-action approach resolves the contradiction by addressing reliability issues before they manifest while preserving driver perception.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentEP3730383B1Turning control system
Publication Date: 2024.02.28 JTEKT CORP
  • EP3730383B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3730383B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3730383B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A turning control system (40) includes an electronic control unit. The electronic control unit is configured to perform: a steering operation amount calculating process (M16) of calculating a steering operation amount; an angle command value calculating process of calculating an angle command value; an angle operation amount calculating process (M50) of calculating an angle operation amount; an operation process of operating a drive circuit of an electric motor; an adjustment process of adjusting a magnitude of a value obtained by subtracting the angle operation amount which is reflected in the operation process from the angle operation amount; and a correction process of correcting a magnitude of an input when the angle command value is calculated in the angle command value calculating process to be less when the magnitude of the subtracted value is great than when the magnitude of the subtracted value is small.