Two-NMOS Ring Oscillator Inverter for Low Supply Sensitivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ring oscillators are highly sensitive to supply voltage fluctuations and temperature variations, leading to increased power consumption and instability in systems like phase-locked loops.

Innovation Solution

Inverters based on NMOS transistors with specific circuitry for bias voltage control and capacitance tuning, along with temperature-compensated bias voltage generation, reduce supply sensitivity and stabilize oscillation frequency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If high PSRR LDOs and active current sources are added to reject supply noise, then supply voltage rejection is improved, but minimum supply voltage requirements increase and power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupply voltage noise rejectionVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the high PSRR LDO and active current source circuitry from the system. Instead of using these complex noise rejection components, the invention uses a simplified inverter design with two NMOS transistors that inherently achieves low supply sensitivity without requiring additional power-hungry regulation circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive, complex high PSRR regulation circuitry with a simple, low-cost inverter design using basic NMOS transistors. This simpler design achieves the same noise rejection function without the overhead of sophisticated power regulation components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If high PSRR LDOs and active current sources are added to reject supply noise, then supply voltage rejection is improved, but minimum supply voltage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupply voltage noise rejectionVSAvoidminimum supply voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the high PSRR LDO circuitry that would otherwise be required to achieve good supply noise rejection. The simplified inverter design using two NMOS transistors achieves low supply sensitivity inherently, eliminating the need for additional voltage regulation stages that would raise the minimum supply voltage requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of adding complex regulation circuitry on top of a conventional inverter to achieve low supply sensitivity, the patent inverts the approach by designing the inverter itself with a novel two-NMOS structure that inherently provides low supply sensitivity, eliminating the need for additional regulation stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Device complexity

If conventional ring oscillator design is used, then circuit simplicity is maintained, but temperature sensitivity increases causing PLL to go out of lock

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit simplicityVSAvoidtemperature stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the inverter stage itself temperature-compensated through the specific two-NMOS transistor configuration. Rather than adding global temperature compensation circuitry to a conventional oscillator, the temperature stability is built into the local inverter structure, maintaining overall circuit simplicity while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Device complexity

If conventional inverter design is used, then design simplicity is maintained, but delay sensitivity to supply voltage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinverter design simplicityVSAvoiddelay sensitivity to supply voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional inverter design by using two NMOS transistors instead of the traditional NMOS-PMOS configuration. This inverted structure with the second NMOS transistor connected to the drain of the first creates a circuit that is inherently less sensitive to supply voltage variations, reducing delay sensitivity while keeping the design simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS20260081609A1Inverter and ring oscillator based on inverter
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 NXP BV
  • US20260081609A1 patent drawing
  • US20260081609A1 patent drawing
  • US20260081609A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An inverter and a ring oscillator comprising a plurality of the inverters arranged in a ring is disclosed. Each inverter comprises an inverter input and an inverter output, wherein the inverter output of each inverter in the ring is coupled to the inverter input of the respective next inverter in the ring. At least one of the plurality of inverters comprises: a first NMOS transistor, comprising a first gate terminal coupled to the respective inverter input, a first drain terminal coupled to the respective inverter output, and a first source terminal; and a second NMOS transistor, comprising a second gate terminal, a second drain terminal and a second source terminal, wherein said second source terminal is coupled to said first drain terminal.