Two-Wheel Vehicle Overturn Prevention via Velocity-Based Lean Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for improving the stability of two-wheeled vehicles do not effectively address traveling instability in the low-velocity region, leading to potential overturns, especially during low-speed turns like U-turns, where small changes in velocity significantly affect the vehicle's balance.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that estimate maximum allowable lean angles based on vehicle body velocities, adjust engine drive force to prevent overturning by accelerating or decelerating the vehicle, using sensors to detect lean and vehicle velocities, and implement PID control to minimize velocity differences, ensuring stability without altering the turning radius.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional engine torque adjustment methods are used to control acceleration during curve travel, then high-velocity stability is improved, but low-velocity region stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraveling stabilityVSAvoidvehicle body velocity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The control method changes the parameter being controlled from engine torque/acceleration to vehicle body velocity directly. By detecting actual velocity and lean angle, and comparing with predetermined threshold values, the system determines whether to increase velocity to prevent overturning. This parameter change allows the system to adapt to both high-velocity and low-velocity conditions, resolving the contradiction where conventional acceleration control works at high speeds but fails at low speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the vehicle accelerates to maintain stability in low-velocity region, then overturning is prevented, but the driver's intended turning radius may be altered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraveling stabilityVSAvoiddriver's turning intent
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from velocity detection and lean angle detection to determine when acceleration is necessary. By continuously monitoring the actual velocity and comparing it with the predetermined threshold velocity, the system only accelerates when the vehicle is in an unstable low-velocity state. This feedback mechanism allows the system to maintain stability while minimizing interference with the driver's intended turning radius, as acceleration is applied only when necessary for safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary action by detecting the lean angle and velocity before overturning occurs. When the lean angle exceeds the threshold or velocity is below the threshold, the system proactively increases velocity to prevent the harmful effect of overturning. This preliminary anti-action prevents the need for corrective steering inputs that would alter the driver's intended turning radius.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Reliability

If maximum allowable lean angles are preset based on velocity, then stability control is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The maximum allowable lean angles and threshold velocities are predetermined and stored in the control system before operation. This preliminary preparation of control parameters allows the system to quickly compare actual sensor readings against pre-established safety thresholds without requiring complex real-time calculations. The predetermined values are set based on the relationship between velocity and stable lean angles, enabling simple yet effective stability control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2886431B1Overturn prevention method and device for two-wheel vehicle
Publication Date: 2020.10.21 BOSCH CORP
  • EP2886431B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2886431B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP2886431B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

There is provided a two-wheeled vehicle overturn prevention method, wherein maximum allowable lean angles corresponding to vehicle body velocities are preset in relation to lean angles of a vehicle body, and in a case where an actual lean angle of the vehicle body exceeds a maximum allowable lean angle corresponding to an actual vehicle body velocity of the vehicle body or in a case where an estimated lean angle of the vehicle body after a predetermined amount of time exceeds or looks to exceed a maximum allowable lean angle corresponding to an estimated vehicle body velocity, the two-wheeled vehicle overturn prevention method is adapted to accelerate the vehicle body or keep the vehicle body from decelerating.