Two-Wheeler Roll Stabilization Using IMU Feedback Torque Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing two-wheeled vehicle stabilization systems are bulky, complex, and costly, with delayed stabilization that affects rider confidence and safety, particularly at low speeds, due to their reliance on multiple flywheels, heavy actuators, and expensive sensors.

Innovation Solution

A compact stabilization control system using inertial measurement units to estimate roll angles and provide calculated reaction torque through a self-stabilizing control unit, actuator driver, and sensors, enabling instantaneous stabilization by comparing desired and feedback roll angles and adjusting actuator output accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If multiple flywheels and heavy actuators are used for stabilization, then vehicle stability is improved, but device complexity and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle stabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the complex multiple flywheel system from the stabilization mechanism. Instead, it uses a single actuator with a stabilizing member that can be rotated about a longitudinal axis, significantly simplifying the system architecture while maintaining stabilization effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical flywheel-based stabilization system with an electronically controlled actuator system. The actuator receives control signals based on sensor feedback and adjusts the stabilizing member's position accordingly, substituting complex mechanical momentum-based stabilization with a more controllable electronic-mechanical hybrid approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Stability of the object's composition

If conventional stabilization systems are used, then vehicle stability is achieved, but response time is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle stabilityVSAvoidstabilization response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system where sensors detect the vehicle's actual position and orientation, and this information is fed back to the control unit. The control unit continuously adjusts the actuator's position based on the difference between desired and actual states, enabling rapid response and correction of instability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary stabilization actions by continuously monitoring vehicle parameters and making small adjustments before significant instability occurs. The actuator is positioned in advance to counteract anticipated tilting or rolling based on sensor predictions and control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If multiple sensors and complex control units are used, then measurement precision is improved, but system cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroll angle measurement precisionVSAvoidsensor and control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs sensors that serve multiple functions: detecting roll angle, pitch angle, and linear acceleration. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized sensors for each parameter, simplifying the overall sensor suite while maintaining comprehensive vehicle state monitoring capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit integrates multiple control functions into a single processing unit that manages actuator positioning, stabilizing member rotation control, and sensor data fusion. This merging of control functions reduces the number of separate control units needed and simplifies the overall control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides immediate and robust stabilization, reducing the vehicle's tendency to lean, enhancing safety and rider confidence by maintaining upright stability at low speeds with reduced latency and lower costs, using fewer and less expensive components.

Implementation Method 1

A compact stabilization control system using inertial measurement units to estimate roll angles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

using inertial measurement units to estimate roll angles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGyroscope: Gyroscope

Implementation Method 3

provide calculated reaction torque through a self-stabilizing control unit, actuator driver

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20230264685A1A stabilization control system and a method to control the control system thereof
Publication Date: 2023.08.24 TVS MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20230264685A1 patent drawing
  • US20230264685A1 patent drawing
  • US20230264685A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A stabilization control system for a saddled vehicle including: a vehicle roll angle data unit including a predetermined roll angle of the vehicle; a comparator unit that is configured to receive inputs from the vehicle roll angle data unit and a feedback roll angle data unit and is configured to determine a difference roll angle data between the inputs from the vehicle roll angle data unit and the feedback roll angle data unit; a stabilization control unit that is configured to receive the difference roll angle data from the comparator unit and is configured to enable an actuator driver based upon the difference roll angle data received; and one or more vehicle sensors that are configured to provide inputs to the stabilization control unit.