Automated UAV Fulfillment System with Robotic Evaluation and Loading

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current UAV systems lack efficient automated processes for evaluating and loading packages, leading to increased turnaround time and reduced utilization due to the need for significant human involvement in testing and packaging operations.

Innovation Solution

An automated system that includes a facility with conveyor belts, evaluation stations, and robotic arms to test and repair UAVs, and a package loading station that can load packages onto UAVs with minimal human intervention, utilizing a UAV fulfillment management service to manage operations and communication with UAVs and automated devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated evaluation and loading systems are implemented, then productivity and UAV utilization increase, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUAV utilizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated fulfillment system is divided into distinct functional modules: evaluation stations (structural, diagnostic, power testing), conveyor systems for UAV transport, robotic arms for package handling, and loading stations. Each module operates independently but coordinates through the fulfillment management service, allowing high productivity through automation while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A fulfillment management service acts as an intermediary between various automated components (conveyors, evaluation stations, robotic arms, loading stations) and UAVs. This software layer coordinates operations, manages communication protocols, and orchestrates the fulfillment process, enabling automated high-productivity operations while abstracting the underlying system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If manual evaluation and loading processes are used, then device complexity is lower, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturnaround timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous automated evaluation and loading operations through conveyor belts that continuously transport UAVs between evaluation stations and loading areas. Robotic arms continuously handle packages, and the fulfillment management service continuously coordinates operations, eliminating idle time and manual intervention delays while managing complexity through automated control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

UAVs undergo automated structural, diagnostic, and power testing at evaluation stations before being loaded with packages. The fulfillment management service pre-coordinates evaluation sequences and package assignments, preparing UAVs for immediate deployment. This preliminary automated evaluation eliminates manual inspection time and ensures readiness before loading, reducing overall turnaround time while using automated systems to manage the complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10266346B1Automated fulfillment of unmanned aerial vehicles
Publication Date: 2019.04.23 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10266346B1 patent drawing
  • US10266346B1 patent drawing
  • US10266346B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for evaluating and loading vehicles (e.g., aerial vehicles and other vehicles) are described herein. The vehicles are moved by a conveyance device. It may be determined whether a vehicle passes at least one of a structural integrity test or a functionality test. The vehicle may be removed from the conveyance device, e.g., by a robotic manipulator, in the event the vehicle fails at least one of the structural integrity test or the functionality test.