Uniflow Cyclone Separator Stable Vortex Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cyclone separators face issues such as gas and particle by-passing, instability of the vortex, particle migration against the centrifugal field, entrainment of particles by secondary vortices, and limited gas capacity due to physical constraints in fluidized bed vessels, which reduce efficiency in separating fine particles.

Innovation Solution

The design of a stackable uniflow cyclone separator with a continuous, uninterrupted vortex through each stage, eliminating secondary vortices and gas by-passing, and optimizing the vortex structure to enhance particle collection efficiency by maintaining a stable vortex flow and reducing pressure drop.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional cyclone separator design is used, then gas capacity is limited by physical constraints in fluidized bed vessels, but device footprint is reduced by stacking stages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas capacityVSAvoiddevice footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The cyclone separator transitions from horizontal arrangement to vertical stacking, utilizing the vertical dimension to increase gas handling capacity while reducing horizontal footprint. Multiple stages are arranged vertically with gas flowing upward through each stage, allowing compact integration without compromising separation performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The design nests multiple cyclone stages within a single vertical vessel, with each stage containing its own separation chamber and outlet. The concentric arrangement of cyclone chambers within the vessel allows maximum utilization of available space while maintaining efficient gas flow paths

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Stability of the object's composition

If secondary vortices are present in cyclone separator, then particle migration against centrifugal field occurs, but vortex structure becomes unstable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevortex stabilityVSAvoidparticle separation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The design extracts and eliminates secondary vortices from the cyclone separator by optimizing the vortex finder geometry and inlet configuration. This removal of harmful secondary flow patterns prevents particle migration against the centrifugal field while maintaining a stable primary vortex for reliable particle separation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The cyclone separator optimizes geometric parameters including vortex finder diameter, inlet angle, and barrel length to control vortex development. These parameter adjustments create a stable single-vortex flow pattern that prevents particle migration and maintains consistent separation efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If gas by-passing occurs in cyclone separator, then particle collection efficiency decreases, but pressure drop is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure dropVSAvoidparticle collection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The design converts the potential harmful effect of gas by-passing into a beneficial feature by configuring the cyclone stages to utilize by-pass flow for cooling purposes. The gas that would otherwise bypass the separation zone is redirected to cool particles or serve other process functions, eliminating the efficiency penalty while maintaining low pressure drop

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design improves the efficiency of particle separation, increases the gas handling capacity, and reduces the footprint of cyclone pairs, leading to enhanced flue gas power recovery and reduced particle entrainment, while maintaining a stable and efficient vortex flow.

Implementation Method 1

The vane is attached to the center pipe proximate the gas inlet and creates a vortex from the injected gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

entrained solids within the vortex are removed by entering the dust hopper via the peripheral channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 3

entrained solids within the vortex are removed by entering the dust hopper via the peripheral channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational settling: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS11819861B2Uniflow cyclone separator with stable vortex and tangential heavy phase extraction
Publication Date: 2023.11.21 HEDRICK BRIAN W
  • US11819861B2 patent drawing
  • US11819861B2 patent drawing
  • US11819861B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A uniflow cyclone that has multiple inlets, normally achieved via a vane, a barrel length, then a solids collection channel of larger diameter but concentric with the barrel and a tangential solids outlet to either a plenum or a dust hopper. The gas flows past the enlarged channel and continues through additional barrel length to an outlet zone. The cyclone would normally have a concentric center pipe the extends from the vane to the gas outlet of the cyclone.