Universal Control System for Accessible Mechanical Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional control systems for complex mechanical systems require full physical capabilities and limit design flexibility, making them inaccessible for individuals with physical limitations and complicating accurate input interpretation.

Innovation Solution

A control system that uses user input devices to transform human inputs, such as head movement or bite pressure, into electronic signals, which are filtered and processed to provide control inputs to complex systems, enabling feedback and operation by individuals with limited physical capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional mechanical control connections are used, then control reliability is improved, but accessibility for individuals with physical limitations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol reliabilityVSAvoidaccessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical control connections (steering wheels, pedals, joysticks) with alternative input mechanisms including voice recognition systems, eye-tracking technology, head movement sensors, and neural interface devices. This substitution enables individuals with physical limitations to control complex mechanical systems without requiring manual dexterity or motor skills, thereby improving accessibility while maintaining control reliability through multiple redundant input channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system integrates multiple types of input devices (voice, eye-tracking, head movement, neural signals) into a single universal control platform that can serve diverse user needs. This multi-functional approach allows the same system to accommodate able-bodied users, individuals with mobility impairments, and those with varying degrees of physical capability, thereby enhancing adaptability without sacrificing control reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If mechanical input devices with range of motion are used, then control precision is improved, but packaging flexibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidpackaging flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces bulky mechanical input devices requiring significant range of motion with compact electronic and optical sensing systems. Eye-tracking cameras, head position sensors, and voice recognition microarrays can be integrated into small form factors while maintaining or exceeding the control precision of traditional mechanical devices, thereby improving packaging flexibility without sacrificing measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from three-dimensional mechanical movements (steering wheel rotation, pedal depression) to detecting movements in different dimensional spaces (eye position on a two-dimensional plane, head orientation in three-dimensional space, voice frequency spectra). This dimensional transformation enables precise control inputs without requiring large physical movement ranges, improving packaging flexibility while maintaining control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple user input devices are integrated, then accessibility is improved, but difficulty of detecting and measuring deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidinput interpretation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The control system incorporates multiple feedback mechanisms including visual displays showing detected input signals, haptic feedback confirming command recognition, and auditory feedback verifying voice command interpretation. This feedback loop allows users to verify that their input (whether voice, eye movement, or head position) has been correctly detected and interpreted, thereby reducing ambiguity and improving input interpretation accuracy across multiple input devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer that translates diverse input signals (voice, eye-tracking, head movement, neural signals) into a standardized control language that the mechanical system can understand. This intermediary layer filters, validates, and disambiguates inputs from multiple sources, reducing the difficulty of detecting and measuring the user's intended command while maintaining accessibility across different input modalities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9919694B1Control system for a complex mechanical system
Publication Date: 2018.03.20 BAE SYST SPACE & MISSION SYST INC
  • US9919694B1 patent drawing
  • US9919694B1 patent drawing
  • US9919694B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Control systems and methods for facilitating human control of complex systems, including complex mechanical systems, are provided. The control system can include one or more user input devices adapted to receive user inputs in various forms. Electronic signals generated by the user input devices in response to the user inputs are provided to a controller, which processes the signals, validates and prioritizes those signals, and generates appropriate control signals. The control signals are then provided to the controlled system. User feedback regarding the operation of the control system, the controlled system, an operating environment, or the like, can be delivered to the user through the control system.