Isolated Urease Cementation for Fine Sand and Silt

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for soil improvement through mineral precipitation are limited to medium or coarser sands and face challenges such as microbial growth requirements and pore plugging, restricting their application to finer permeable materials like fine sands and silts.

Innovation Solution

Combining isolated urease, urea, a source of divalent cations, and an organic additive with permeable or fractured starting materials to induce carbonate precipitation and cementation, allowing for effective treatment of a broader range of soils, including fine sands and silts, while avoiding plugging issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If microbial-based carbonate precipitation methods are used for soil improvement, then treatment effectiveness on medium or coarser sands is improved, but application to finer permeable materials like fine sands and silts is restricted due to pore plugging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability to different soil typesVSAvoidpore plugging
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the harmful microbial components from the system and replaces them with isolated urease enzyme. This eliminates the pore plugging issue caused by microbial growth while retaining the beneficial carbonate precipitation function. The enzyme can be applied to finer soils without the risk of biological plugging that limits microbial-based methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an organic additive as an intermediary substance that facilitates carbonate precipitation without causing plugging. This intermediary enables the process to work effectively in finer permeable materials by providing a different mechanism for crystal formation that doesn't block pores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If microbial growth is required for carbonate precipitation, then effective treatment can be achieved in medium or coarser sands, but the complexity of the process increases and finer materials cannot be treated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the complex microbial growth requirement from the process by using isolated urease enzyme directly. This simplifies the treatment protocol while maintaining reliability, as the enzyme can be applied without needing to establish and maintain microbial populations, making the process more controllable and less complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The isolated urease enzyme performs the carbonate precipitation function independently without requiring microbial hosts. The enzyme self-catalyzes the urea hydrolysis reaction to produce carbonate ions, eliminating the need for complex microbial culture and growth conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Strength

If multiple treatment cycles are used to improve soil properties, then bearing capacity and strength can be enhanced, but the time and cost of treatment increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoil strength and bearing capacityVSAvoidtreatment time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The isolated urease enzyme provides continuous carbonate production as long as urea and divalent cations are present, allowing sustained precipitation without interruption for microbial growth cycles. This continuous action achieves the required strength enhancement in fewer application cycles compared to microbial methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the kinetic parameters of carbonate production by using isolated enzyme instead of microbial systems. The enzyme reacts more rapidly and predictably, allowing the treatment to reach effective strength levels in less time with fewer cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances the stiffness, strength, and liquefaction resistance of soils, enabling significant improvements in bearing capacity, settlement reduction, and lateral resistance, with the ability to treat finer materials and reduce the need for multiple treatment cycles.

Implementation Method 1

combining a column of a permeable starting material or a column of a non-porous but fractured starting material with a mixture comprising (a) isolated urease; (b) urea

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzyme catalysis: Enzyme

Implementation Method 2

combining a column of a permeable starting material or a column of a non-porous but fractured starting material with a mixture comprising (a) isolated urease; (b) urea

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 3

the combining is carried out under conditions suitable to cause carbonate precipitation and/or cementation of the starting material within the column

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation: Precipitation

Data Source

PatentUS11274323B2Cementation methods
Publication Date: 2022.03.15 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US11274323B2 patent drawing
  • US11274323B2 patent drawing
  • US11274323B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides methods for mineral precipitation and/or cementation of permeable or fractured non-porous materials using isolated urease.