User Data Broadcast with Adaptive Reed-Solomon Error Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current communication systems face challenges in efficiently compensating for information not received, or erasures, in Random Phase Multiple Access (RPMA) communication systems, which affects the reliability and accuracy of data transmission.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a method and system that uses forward error correction techniques, specifically Reed Solomon encoding, to create and transmit encoded signals, where the transmission of a second predetermined part of the encoded signal is terminated upon successful decoding by the receiver, and the use of acknowledgments or negative acknowledgments to determine successful decoding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the entire encoded signal is transmitted to ensure reliable decoding, then the reliability of data transmission is improved, but the transmission time and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of data transmissionVSAvoidtransmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The receiver sends an acknowledgment signal back to the transmitter upon successful decoding. This feedback mechanism allows the transmitter to terminate transmission early when decoding succeeds, resolving the contradiction by making transmission duration adaptive rather than fixed, thus reducing average transmission time while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The transmission duration is made dynamic rather than static. The system adjusts the transmission duration based on real-time decoding success, allowing early termination when possible. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction by optimizing transmission time for each specific case while ensuring reliability through the ability to transmit the full signal when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If forward error correction encoding is applied to correct erasures, then the error correction capability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transmits more redundant symbols than the minimum required for error correction (excessive action). This allows the receiver to successfully decode with fewer received symbols, reducing the need for complex retransmission protocols and simplifying the overall system while maintaining strong error correction capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

Error correction capabilities are built into the encoding process beforehand (preliminary action). By pre-configuring the Reed Solomon encoder with appropriate redundancy levels, the system prepares for potential erasures in advance, simplifying the receiver's task and reducing the need for complex real-time error handling mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the transmission is terminated early upon successful decoding, then the productivity is improved, but the reliability may be compromised if decoding fails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission efficiencyVSAvoiddecoding reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The acknowledgment feedback mechanism ensures that early termination only occurs when decoding is genuinely successful. This resolves the contradiction by providing verification that reliability has been maintained before productivity gains from early termination are realized, preventing premature termination in cases where decoding actually failed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If acknowledgments are used to determine decoding success, then the measurement precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding success determination accuracyVSAvoidcommunication protocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The acknowledgment function is extracted as a separate, simple signal transmission rather than being embedded in the main data protocol. This resolves the contradiction by isolating the complexity of reliable decoding determination into a dedicated, simple acknowledgment mechanism, improving measurement precision without significantly increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS8290023B2User data broadcast mechanism
Publication Date: 2012.10.16 INGENU INC
  • US8290023B2 patent drawing
  • US8290023B2 patent drawing
  • US8290023B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates to method, device and system for detecting errors in a communication system. A signal is received from a transmitter at a receiver wherein the signal includes a data portion and a result of a hash function. The hash function is computed in part from a transmitter identification code. The receiver determines if the result of the hash function matches both the data portion and the transmitter identification code. The receiver discards the signal if the result of the hash function does not match both the data portion and the transmitter identification code of the transmitter.