Compliant Vacuum Cup Lip Structure for Noise Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing end-effectors for robotic systems face challenges in securely grasping a wide variety of objects without producing unacceptable noise levels, particularly when using vacuum pressure, due to inadequate sealing and lip vibration.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating noise mitigation features such as protrusions, lands, or bumps on the vacuum cup lip to increase mass and reduce vibration, while maintaining flexibility for effective sealing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a flexible vacuum cup with compliant lip is used to adapt to variations in surface structures, then the sealing capability is improved, but the noise level increases due to lip vibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing capabilityVSAvoidnoise level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the principle of mechanical vibration by intentionally inducing controlled vibrations in the compliant lip through vacuum pressure differentials. The vibrating compliant lip creates a sealing action against the object surface while the vibration frequency is controlled to minimize noise generation. This resolves the contradiction by using vibration to enhance sealing rather than avoiding it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the compliant lip by varying its material properties (flexibility, elasticity) and geometric parameters (thickness, shape) to optimize the balance between sealing capability and noise generation. By adjusting these parameters, the lip can adapt to surface variations while controlling vibration amplitudes that cause noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the vacuum cup lip is made less flexible to reduce noise, then the noise level is reduced, but the adaptability to different object surfaces deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise levelVSAvoidadaptability to object surfaces
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating zones of different flexibility within the compliant lip structure. Different portions of the lip have varying degrees of compliance tailored to their specific functions - some areas provide adaptability to surface variations while other areas control vibration to minimize noise. This localized differentiation resolves the contradiction between flexibility and noise reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials or multi-layer structures for the compliant lip, combining materials with different mechanical properties. This allows the lip to exhibit both flexibility for sealing and damping characteristics for noise reduction, resolving the contradiction through material composition rather than single-material properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Force

If vacuum pressure is increased to improve grasping force, then the grasping capability is improved, but the noise level increases due to enhanced lip vibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrasping forceVSAvoidnoise level
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses controlled mechanical vibration at the compliant lip to create a sealing mechanism that works in conjunction with vacuum pressure. The vibration-induced sealing reduces leakage and allows higher vacuum pressures to be applied without excessive noise, as the vibration frequency is managed to prevent loud noise generation while maintaining effective sealing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The noise mitigation features significantly reduce lip vibration and noise generation, ensuring secure grasping and sealing of diverse objects without exceeding safe noise limits.

Implementation Method 1

Many end-effectors employ vacuum pressure for acquiring and securing objects for transport and/or subsequent operations by robotic systems that include articulated arms.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum pressure: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

The compliant lip may be formed of a polymeric or elastomeric material that is flexible enough to allow it to adapt to variations in surface structures.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4010152B1Systems and methods for providing, in programmable motion devices, compliant end effectors with noise mitigation
Publication Date: 2026.04.22 BERKSHIRE GREY OPERATING CO INC
  • EP4010152B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4010152B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B
  • EP4010152B1 patent drawingFigure 4A~4B

AI summary

A vacuum cup is disclosed for use in a programmable motion device. The vacuum cup includes an open inlet for coupling to a vacuum source, and a vacuum cup lip on a portion of tlie vacuum cup that generally surrounds the open inlet. The vacuum cup lip includes an inner surface that defines the open outlet through which a vacuum may be provided, and includes noise mitigation features on an outer surface of the vacuum cup lip.