VAE and Methylcellulose Binder for Aqueous Battery Electrodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aqueous battery systems face challenges in selecting a suitable binder system that is chemically compatible with the electrolyte and effectively binds active materials, with traditional binders like PTFE being expensive and causing issues due to decomposition and mechanical stresses, while alternative binders like SBR and EVA lack binding quality and require additional robust binders.

Innovation Solution

The use of a combination of Vinyl Acetate-Ethylene (VAE) and methylcellulose-based binders, such as CarboxyMethylCellulose (CMC) or HydroxyPropyl MethylCellulose (HPMC), which provides a cost-effective, surfactant-free, water-based binder system that enhances the robustness and electrochemical performance of electrodes in alkaline Ni—Zn battery systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional binders like PTFE are used, then binding robustness is improved, but cost increases and decomposition issues occur under mechanical stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding robustnessVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters of the binder system by replacing PTFE with VAE and methylcellulose-based binders. This substitution maintains binding robustness while reducing production costs and eliminating decomposition issues associated with traditional PTFE binders under mechanical stress and thermal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite binder system combining VAE (vinyl acetate-ethylene) and methylcellulose-based binders (CMC or HPMC). This composite approach leverages the complementary properties of each component: VAE provides flexibility and adhesion, while methylcellulose offers structural integrity and chemical compatibility with aqueous electrolytes, together achieving robust binding without the drawbacks of single-material PTFE systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If alternative binders like SBR and EVA are used, then cost is reduced, but binding quality deteriorates and additional robust binders are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction costVSAvoidbinding quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a synergistic composite binder system where VAE and methylcellulose-based binders work together to achieve superior binding quality that neither component could provide alone. This combination eliminates the need for additional robust binders required when using SBR or EVA, as the VAE-methylcellulose system inherently provides sufficient binding strength and chemical compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the compositional parameters of the binder system by selecting specific ratios and types of VAE and methylcellulose derivatives. This parameter optimization achieves cost-effective binding without compromising quality, directly addressing the shortfall of alternative binders like SBR and EVA that require supplementary materials to achieve adequate binding performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If VAE and methylcellulose-based binders are used, then binding robustness and electrochemical performance are improved, but binder system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrochemical performanceVSAvoidbinder system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves multi-functionality within the binder system where VAE and methylcellulose-based binders collectively provide multiple functions: mechanical binding, chemical compatibility with aqueous electrolytes, electrochemical stability, and structural integrity. This universal approach improves electrochemical performance without requiring separate additional components, thereby managing complexity through functional integration rather than proliferation of materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This binder combination results in mechanically robust and high-performing electrodes with superior utilization and cycle life, eliminating the need for additional binders and reducing production costs, as demonstrated by the comparison with other binder systems in the tests.

Implementation Method 1

a combination of Vinyl Acetate-Ethylene (VAE) and methylcellulose-based additives, such as CarboxyMethylCellulose (CMC) or HydroxyPropyl MethylCellulose (HPMC), binding the conductive substrate, electrochemically active materials, and material additives together

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS11404696B1Secondary aqueous battery electrodes including vinyl acetate-ethylene
Publication Date: 2022.08.02 ZAF ENERGY SYSTEMS INC
  • US11404696B1 patent drawing
  • US11404696B1 patent drawing
  • US11404696B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A green secondary electrode includes a conductive substrate, active material and material additives in direct contact with the conductive substrate, and a combination of vinyl acetate-ethylene and methylcellulose-based additive binding the conductive substrate, active materials, and material additives together. The green secondary electrode may be a positive electrode or a negative electrode.