Spoke Manufacturing with Variable Cross-Section Forming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing spokes from wire materials lack precision and consistency in achieving tight tolerances, leading to optical differences and increased effort in selecting spokes for wheels, resulting in waste and suboptimal performance.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a molding tool with synchronized opposing tool units that changes the relative position of the wire material using different positioning movements to shape and reduce cross sections, ensuring precise dimensional accuracy and reproducibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional reducing machines are used to produce spokes with different thickness sections, then a wide variety of spoke types can be produced, but the manufacturing precision and tolerance consistency deteriorate, leading to optical differences and increased selection effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariety of spoke typesVSAvoidtolerance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The forming process is divided into multiple discrete forming sections along the spoke length, each with independently controllable positioning movements. This allows different shaft sections to be formed with precise control over transition areas, achieving tight tolerances while producing various spoke types through configuration changes of the forming tool and positioning parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The feed device employs dynamically adjustable positioning movements that can be precisely controlled during the forming process. The positioning movements are adaptable to different spoke types and can be adjusted in real-time to maintain tight tolerances across various shaft sections and transition areas, resolving the contradiction between versatility and precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional forming processes are used, then production is simpler, but the dimensional accuracy and reproducibility of cross sections deteriorate, requiring pre-selection of spokes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction simplicityVSAvoiddimensional accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The forming process incorporates feedback control through synchronized positioning movements and tool unit coordination. The control system monitors and adjusts the positioning movements to maintain precise dimensional accuracy of cross sections, eliminating the need for post-production selection while keeping the manufacturing process straightforward

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves high dimensional accuracy by precisely controlling and changing positioning parameters during forming. Different positioning movements with specific parameters are applied to form various cross sections with tight tolerances, improving reproducibility without complicating the manufacturing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If tighter tolerances are achieved through improved positioning movements, then optical differences are eliminated, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetolerance tightnessVSAvoidpositioning control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The positioning movements are merged with the existing feed device structure, utilizing the same mechanical components for both feeding and positioning functions. This integration achieves tight tolerances without proportionally increasing device complexity, as the positioning control is combined with the feeding mechanism rather than being a separate system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method achieves significantly tighter tolerances and improved precision in spoke production, eliminating the need for pre-selection and reducing waste, while enhancing the mechanical properties and visual appeal of the spokes.

Implementation Method 1

the wire material is shaped and/or reduced at least in sections with the shaping tool or by embossing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3135396B1Method for producing spokes
Publication Date: 2021.04.07 DT SWISS AG
  • EP3135396B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3135396B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3135396B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method and a device (1) for manufacturing spokes (100) from a wire material (3), in particular for at least partially muscle-powered two-wheeled vehicles (200). The spokes (100) have a spoke shaft (101) with at least two shaft sections (111, 121). The shaft sections (111, 121) differ in at least one cross-section (103). To form the cross-sections (103), the wire material (3) is formed at least section by section with a forming tool (4). The relative position (43) of the wire material (3) with respect to the forming tool (4) is changed in the axial direction during the forming process. In order to shape the cross-sections (103) in the two shaft sections (111, 121), the relative position (43) of the wire material (3) in relation to the forming tool (4) is changed with different positioning movements (7).