Variable Speed Ratio Artificial Hand via Friction Hinges

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Sub-actuated artificial hands with fewer actuators than degrees of freedom are limited in the number of poses and grips they can achieve, as they have an invariable speed ratio between phalanges/fingers connected to a single actuator, making it difficult to change finger closure order or assume different poses/grips effectively, particularly in prosthetic applications where command variability is restricted.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a sub-actuated robotic hand with a mechanism of hinges and elastic means allowing variable rotation speeds between phalanges and the palm, utilizing a distribution mechanism with pulleys and cables of different friction coefficients to control reciprocal rotation speeds, and an EMG sensor for muscle contraction-based control, enabling a greater variety of poses and grips.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single actuator controls multiple phalanges/fingers, then the number of actuators is reduced, but the speed ratio between connected phalanges becomes invariable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of actuatorsVSAvoidspeed ratio variability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by making the transmission ratio variable rather than fixed. The mechanism allows the speed ratio between connected phalanges to change dynamically during movement, enabling different phases of finger closure to occur at different relative speeds. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining the reduced actuator count while gaining speed ratio variability through a dynamically adjustable transmission mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the transmission ratio parameter from a fixed value to a variable parameter that can be adjusted during operation. By implementing a mechanism where the transmission ratio between the actuator and connected phalanges can be modified, the system achieves variable speed control without increasing the number of actuators, thus resolving the technical contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If sub-actuated artificial hands are used, then the number of actuators is smaller than degrees of freedom, but the number of definable poses is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of actuatorsVSAvoidnumber of poses
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

By implementing variable transmission ratios in the mechanism, the patent enables the hand to achieve a greater number of distinct poses with fewer actuators. The dynamic adjustment capability allows the system to access multiple configuration states that would otherwise require more actuators, thus resolving the contradiction between reduced actuator count and limited pose variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If sub-actuated artificial hands are used, then the structure is simpler, but the ability to change finger closure order is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestructureVSAvoidfinger closure order control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by incorporating a dynamic transmission mechanism that allows the operator to control the closure order of fingers independently. The variable transmission ratio enables different phalanges to move at different relative speeds, allowing the operator to achieve desired closure sequences without requiring a complex multi-actuator system, thus maintaining structural simplicity while improving operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows the artificial hand to define a larger number of poses and grips, better meeting user expectations by varying the relative speeds of degrees of freedom, enhancing usability and simplicity of control, and improving the satisfaction of prosthetic hand users.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing a distribution mechanism with pulleys and cables of different friction coefficients to control reciprocal rotation speeds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

an EMG sensor for muscle contraction-based control

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromyography:

Implementation Method 3

a mechanism of hinges and elastic means allowing variable rotation speeds between phalanges and the palm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10912661B2Artificial hand
Publication Date: 2021.02.09 UNIV DI PISA
  • US10912661B2 patent drawing
  • US10912661B2 patent drawing
  • US10912661B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An artificial hand is provided. The artificial includes phalanges suitable to reproduce at least one finger, hinges hinging a first element identifying a phalanx to a second element identifying a second phalanx, and an implementation mechanism suitable to command a reciprocal rotation between the hinges defining a mutual rotation speed between the first and second element. The hinges define different damping coefficients so that, during a mutual rotation of the first and second element, they are subject to distinct damping forces opposing mutual rotation and proportional to the mutual rotation speed so as to vary the movement of the artificial hand as a function of the mutual rotation speed.