Varying Pixel Shapes for Undistorted Optical Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional lighting devices with light-emitting pixels struggle to maintain optical image quality and efficiency, often resulting in distorted images and increased pixel surface area, which can be costly and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A lighting device with a pixel array featuring light-emitting pixels of varying shapes and sizes, utilizing imaging optics to minimize distortion and achieve undistorted or minimally distorted optical images in the illumination region, while allowing for flexible light distribution with separately controllable pixels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional lighting devices use uniform pixel arrays with regular shapes, then manufacturing is simpler, but optical image distortion occurs and pixel surface area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical image qualityVSAvoidpixel shape variation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by varying the shapes of pixels within the pixel array. Different pixels have different geometric shapes (e.g., rectangular, square, triangular, circular) rather than using uniform shapes. This asymmetric design compensates for optical distortions in the imaging system, allowing undistorted or minimally distorted optical images to be generated while maintaining cost-effective manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by assigning different shapes to pixels at different locations within the pixel array. The shape of each pixel is specifically tailored to its position and the local optical distortion characteristics. This allows the pixel array to collectively compensate for spatially varying optical distortions, improving overall image quality without requiring complex global adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Area of stationary object

If more pixels with uniform size are used, then illumination coverage increases, but pixel surface area and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveillumination coverageVSAvoidnumber of pixels
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by varying the size and shape parameters of pixels across the array. Pixels closer to the center of the illumination region may have different dimensions than pixels at the periphery. This allows the pixel array to achieve uniform illumination coverage across the entire target area while using fewer total pixels, reducing cost and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes dimensional variation by allowing pixels to have different shapes and sizes in the plan view. This dimensional diversity enables the pixel array to cover a larger illumination area effectively, as the varied pixel geometries can be optimally distributed to fill the illumination region without requiring a uniform increase in pixel count

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If pixel array is optimized for central region, then spatial resolution in center improves, but peripheral illumination quality may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidperipheral image quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by tailoring pixel shapes and sizes to the specific requirements of different regions within the illumination area. Central pixels may have shapes optimized for high spatial resolution, while peripheral pixels have shapes optimized for coverage and minimal distortion. This localized optimization ensures high quality across the entire illumination region without compromising peripheral performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying pixel geometry parameters across the array. The shape and size parameters are adjusted as a function of position within the pixel array, allowing the system to maintain consistent optical image quality from center to periphery. This gradual parameter transition ensures smooth illumination distribution and uniform resolution characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables cost-effective lighting devices with reduced pixel surface area and number, providing high spatial resolution in central illumination regions and lower resolution further out, suitable for applications like headlamps, while maintaining optical image quality and large illumination coverage.

Implementation Method 1

the lighting device comprises an imaging optics arranged downstream of the pixel array for optically imaging a light radiation generated by means of the pixel array

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical imaging: Lens

Data Source

PatentUS11614215B2Lighting device
Publication Date: 2023.03.28 AMS OSRAM INT GMBH
  • US11614215B2 patent drawing
  • US11614215B2 patent drawing
  • US11614215B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lighting device includes a pixel array of light-emitting pixels arranged next to one another. The pixel array includes light-emitting pixels with different pixel shapes.