Vehicle Assistance System Sensor Masking Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle assistance systems fail to account for normal operating states that could impact the functionality of parking and collision avoidance, particularly when distance sensors are obstructed by vehicle parts, leading to potential collisions during parking or exiting processes.

Innovation Solution

An assistance system that detects when distance sensors are obscured by vehicle parts, such as sliding doors, and automatically deactivates or prevents steering interventions, ensuring all sensors have a clear view of obstacles before initiating semi-automatic parking or exiting, while allowing manual continuation once the obstruction is resolved.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the assistance system performs automatic steering intervention for parking, then parking efficiency is improved, but collision risk increases when sensors are obscured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparking efficiencyVSAvoidcollision avoidance reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a preliminary check of sensor availability and vehicle state (concealment detection) before initiating automatic parking steering intervention. This preliminary action ensures that automatic parking only occurs when sensors are unobscured, preventing collisions while maintaining efficiency when conditions are favorable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors sensor status and vehicle state during the parking process, providing feedback to the control unit. When sensors become obscured during parking, the system detects this change and responds by deactivating further automatic steering intervention, thereby maintaining safety while allowing efficient parking when conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Extent of automation

If the assistance system activates steering intervention, then parking process is automated, but safety is compromised when distance sensors are covered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparking automationVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Before activating automatic steering intervention, the system checks whether distance sensors are unobscured and the vehicle is in a safe state. This preliminary verification prevents activation of automation when sensor coverage is compromised, eliminating the harmful collision risk while preserving automation benefits when conditions are appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and evaluates critical safety parameters (sensor coverage status, vehicle concealment state) separately from the main parking control function. By isolating these safety checks, the system can selectively enable or disable automatic steering intervention based on sensor availability, removing the harmful element (automation) when sensors are covered while retaining it when they are not.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If the system deactivates steering intervention when sensors are covered, then collision protection is improved, but parking process is interrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision protectionVSAvoidparking process continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system prepares for potential sensor obstruction by having a predefined response protocol ready. When sensors become covered, the system smoothly transitions from automatic to manual control mode rather than abrupt interruption, cushioning the impact on parking process continuity while maintaining collision protection. The system also provides user notification to prepare the driver for taking control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Ease of operation

If the system allows parking with covered sensors, then parking space can be measured, but automatic steering intervention becomes unsafe

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparking space detectionVSAvoidsteering intervention safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the parking function into two independent parts: parking space measurement/detection and automatic steering intervention. This segmentation allows the vehicle to perform safe parking space detection even with partially covered sensors, while simultaneously preventing unsafe automatic steering intervention when sensor coverage is insufficient. Each function has its own safety thresholds and activation conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2386464B1Method for parking or leaving a parking space and avoiding a vehicle collision and corresponding assistance system and vehicle
Publication Date: 2017.06.14 VOLKSWAGEN AG
  • EP2386464B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

The method involves detecting a masking condition of a vehicle (10) automatically, in which a distance measuring sensor of the assistance system is masked from a portion of the vehicle. A steering engagement of the assistance system is automatically deactivated or prevented in a steering of the vehicle when the masking condition exists. Independent claims are also included for the following: (1) a method for preventing a collision of a vehicle using an assistance system; and (2) an assistance system with a controller.