Vehicle Backing System Front Wheel Off-Tracking Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current driver assistance systems for vehicles, especially when reversing, struggle to effectively detect and prevent collisions with objects alongside the vehicle, particularly when operating in semi-autonomous or autonomous modes, due to limitations in sensor technology and collision prediction accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A backing system that integrates sensors, cameras, and a controller to detect objects alongside the vehicle, predict potential collision paths, and autonomously adjust steering and braking to avoid collisions by determining the probability of collision and implementing appropriate responses, such as warnings or control inputs, to prevent front wheel off-tracking and side collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If sensors and cameras are used to detect objects alongside the vehicle during reverse operation, then collision detection capability is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the detection task into multiple sensor zones (front, side, rear) with each sensor targeting specific areas. The controller segments the collision risk assessment into different probability levels, enabling focused monitoring rather than uniform coverage, thus improving detection precision without proportionally increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor system is designed to perform multiple functions: detecting objects alongside the vehicle, determining collision probability, and providing data for both warning signals and autonomous steering control. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized systems, improving detection capability while managing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If the system determines predicted vehicle path including front wheel tracking path, then collision prediction accuracy is improved, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates the front wheel tracking path based on vehicle geometry and steering angle before collision assessment. By determining the predicted vehicle path in advance rather than during real-time collision detection, the system achieves high prediction accuracy while managing computational load through preliminary computation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses simplified geometric models and approximations for tracking path calculation rather than complex physics simulations. These computationally lightweight models provide sufficient accuracy for collision prediction without requiring intensive computational resources, effectively using 'cheap' calculation methods for the prediction task

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If autonomous control responses are implemented based on collision probability, then collision avoidance effectiveness is improved, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance effectivenessVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the level of intervention based on calculated collision probability. When probability is low, the system provides information to the driver; when probability exceeds thresholds, the system progressively takes control including issuing warnings and executing autonomous steering commands. This dynamic response strategy improves avoidance effectiveness while managing control complexity through adaptive intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors collision probability and adjusts control responses based on this feedback loop. The controller receives ongoing data from sensors, recalculates collision risk, and modifies steering commands accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables effective collision avoidance through adaptive control rather than static pre-programmed responses, improving reliability while maintaining manageable system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10259453B2Collision avoidance based on front wheel off tracking during reverse operation
Publication Date: 2019.04.16 CONTINENTAL AUTONOMOUS MOBILITY US LLC
  • US10259453B2 patent drawing
  • US10259453B2 patent drawing
  • US10259453B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of avoiding a collision while operating a vehicle in reverse comprises detecting an object proximate to a vehicle with at least one sensor including detecting objects located along side of a vehicle and determining a predicted vehicle path, including a tracking path for front wheels of the vehicle. A probability is determined with a controller located within the vehicle of collision of one of the front corner and a side of the vehicle with the object while the vehicle is travelling in reverse and at least one collision avoidance response is determined with the controller based on the probability of collision.