Autonomous Vehicle Braking Energy Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in dynamically optimizing energy efficiency during transient operations like braking and acceleration, as existing systems struggle to efficiently switch between regenerative and friction braking mechanisms based on real-time conditions.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous vehicle system that includes a central control unit communicating with remote servers and data collectors, using stored parameters to evaluate and adjust operational thresholds for regenerative and friction braking mechanisms, and selecting the most energy-efficient mode based on vehicle and environmental conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If the vehicle uses regenerative braking mechanism, then energy efficiency is improved through power regeneration, but the braking system complexity increases due to coordination between multiple braking mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidbraking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic switching between regenerative and friction braking mechanisms based on real-time vehicle conditions, road slope, and power storage state. The central control unit continuously adjusts the braking mode to optimize energy efficiency while managing system complexity through adaptive control strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as braking force distribution, power storage charge state, and road slope compensation to determine the optimal braking mechanism. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the system achieves energy optimization without requiring permanent structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If the vehicle dynamically switches between braking mechanisms, then energy efficiency during transient operations is improved, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiency during transient operationsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The central control unit serves multiple functions: it monitors vehicle conditions, determines road slope, evaluates power storage state, and selects the appropriate braking mechanism. This multi-functional approach consolidates control complexity into a single unit rather than requiring separate control systems for each braking mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from sensors monitoring vehicle speed, power storage charge state, and road conditions to dynamically adjust braking mechanism selection. This closed-loop control enables energy optimization during transient operations while managing control complexity through real-time adaptive decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If the vehicle compensates for road slope, then braking accuracy is improved, but the computational requirements and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary estimation of road slope using available sensor data and historical information before executing braking commands. By preparing compensation parameters in advance based on predicted conditions, the system reduces real-time computational burden while maintaining braking accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system dynamically optimizes energy efficiency by selecting the appropriate braking mechanism, maximizing power regeneration and reducing energy consumption during transient operations, thereby enhancing the vehicle's overall energy management.

Implementation Method 1

a regenerative braking mechanism and a friction braking mechanism of the braking system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRegenerative braking: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9446768B2System and method for energy optimization in autonomous vehicle operation
Publication Date: 2016.09.20 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US9446768B2 patent drawing
  • US9446768B2 patent drawing
  • US9446768B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Vehicle operating systems are autonomously operated. A transient in an upcoming path of the vehicle is determined from a comparison of vehicle path data and vehicle status data to a threshold of mechanism first operating system. Operational parameters for one of first and second operating systems are selected according to the comparison. The selected operational parameters are applied to the operation of the one of the first and second operating systems.