Vehicle Braking Torque Coordination and Energy Regeneration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle braking systems experience torque shock and inefficient energy regeneration due to rough coordination between motor regenerative torque and hydraulic braking force, especially at low vehicle speeds and strict battery charging limits.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle braking system that includes a lower limit regenerative torque setting unit and a braking control unit to limit regenerative torque based on the motor's rotation speed, input limit, and braking request, ensuring smooth coordination between motor and hydraulic braking forces and maximizing energy regeneration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the torque command of the motor is set by the charging limit value only of the battery, then the motor is controlled to output a large regenerative torque, but hydraulic driving takes a certain time, thereby preventing smooth coordination between the braking force by the motor and the braking force by the machine brake, which may cause torque shock

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy regeneration efficiencyVSAvoidbraking coordination smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by predicting the future regenerative torque based on the current rotation speed and acceleration, and using this predicted value to set the torque command in advance. This allows the braking control to anticipate changes in motor torque and coordinate smoothly with the hydraulic brake, preventing torque shock while maintaining energy regeneration efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by continuously adjusting the torque command based on real-time changes in rotation speed and acceleration. The braking control unit dynamically modifies the torque command to maintain optimal coordination between regenerative braking and hydraulic braking, ensuring smooth braking performance across varying operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the motor is controlled to output a large regenerative torque at low rotation speed, then energy regeneration is maximized, but the coordination with hydraulic brake becomes rough, causing torque shock

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy regeneration amountVSAvoidtorque shock
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses preliminary action by calculating predicted regenerative torque based on current rotation speed and acceleration trends. This prediction allows the system to prepare appropriate torque commands in advance, ensuring smooth transitions and coordination with hydraulic braking, thereby eliminating torque shock while maintaining maximum energy regeneration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies feedback by continuously monitoring rotation speed and acceleration, and using this information to adjust the torque command dynamically. The braking control unit uses feedback from the motor's actual performance to refine the torque command, ensuring optimal energy regeneration without causing torque shock.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If strict battery charging limit is applied, then battery protection is ensured, but the regenerative torque is limited, reducing energy regeneration efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery protectionVSAvoidkinetic energy regeneration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by dynamically adjusting the torque command within the battery charging limit based on real-time operating conditions such as rotation speed and acceleration. This allows the system to maximize energy regeneration within safe battery charging boundaries, adapting to changing conditions while protecting the battery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the torque command parameters based on the battery charging limit and current operating state. The system adjusts key parameters like torque magnitude and timing to optimize energy regeneration while respecting battery constraints, thereby balancing battery protection with energy recovery efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Prevents torque shock and enhances energy efficiency by ensuring smooth coordination between motor and hydraulic braking forces, effectively regenerating kinetic energy into electric power during braking.

Implementation Method 1

at least one motor MG2, MG3 that can output a regenerative torque

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a braking force application unit that applies a braking force by hydraulic actuation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic actuation: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 3

a braking force application unit that applies a braking force by hydraulic actuation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP1979185B1Vehicle, control method thereof and braking device
Publication Date: 2017.01.04 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • EP1979185B1 patent drawing
  • EP1979185B1 patent drawing
  • EP1979185B1 patent drawing

AI summary

During braking, lower limits Tm2min and Tm3min are set based on an input limit Win of a battery and a brake pedal position BP (S190), and the set lower limits Tm2min and Tm3min limit regenerative torques output from motors MG2 and MG3 (S220). This prevents an output of an excessive braking force and torque shock caused by a hydraulic brake being not able to follow sudden changes in the regenerative torques output from the motors MG2 and MG3 when the vehicle speed is reduced.