Vehicle Charging Cable Current Profile for Thermal Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conducting elements in vehicle charging systems are typically designed for continuous operation at maximum battery charge current, leading to oversized and costly components, and there is a need to manage temperature rises to prevent overheating during high-current charging.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle charging system with conducting elements having a continuous current rating less than the maximum charge current, coupled with a controller that controls current flow to limit temperature rises by reducing the current after a predetermined time based on expected temperature increases, using a charging current profile that considers the cross-sectional area of the conducting elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conducting elements are designed for continuous operation at maximum battery charge current, then reliability is improved, but cost and size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidsize
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static continuous current rating to dynamic time-limited current operation. The controller dynamically adjusts current based on time elapsed since charging started, allowing the conducting element to operate at maximum current only during initial periods when temperature is low, then reducing current as time progresses to prevent overheating. This dynamic approach enables smaller conducting elements to safely handle peak charging currents without requiring continuous high-current capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the current parameter over time through a charging current profile that defines maximum current for initial time periods and reduced current thereafter. This parameter change allows the system to optimize between peak power transfer (using high current initially) and thermal management (reducing current later), enabling smaller conducting elements to be used while maintaining both charging performance and thermal safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conducting elements are designed for continuous operation at maximum battery charge current, then reliability is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The dynamic time-limited current operation reduces the continuous current rating requirement for conducting elements, allowing use of smaller gauge wires and smaller connectors. This directly reduces material costs and manufacturing complexity while maintaining reliability through active current management that prevents thermal damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By changing current parameters over time rather than maintaining constant maximum current, the system enables use of less expensive conducting elements with lower continuous current ratings. The controller implements this through a charging current profile that limits current duration, allowing cost-effective conducting elements to safely handle peak charging currents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If current greater than continuous current rating is conducted, then charging speed is improved, but temperature rise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging speedVSAvoidtemperature rise
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action through time-limited current pulses followed by current reduction. The controller allows high current to flow only during initial time periods when thermal accumulation is minimal, then reduces current to prevent excessive temperature rise. This periodic high-current operation enables fast charging while managing thermal effects through time-based current modulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system rushes through the high-current phase quickly by limiting its duration to only what is necessary for initial charging. The controller allows maximum current to flow only for the minimum time required to deliver significant charge before transitioning to reduced current mode, thereby achieving fast charging objectives while minimizing thermal accumulation in the conducting elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

4Weight of stationary object

If smaller cross section cable is used, then cost and size are reduced, but current carrying capacity is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesizeVSAvoidcurrent carrying capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing time-limited current operation that matches the thermal capacity of smaller conducting elements. The controller dynamically adjusts current based on time elapsed, allowing smaller cables to temporarily handle peak currents during initial charging periods when temperature is low, then reducing current as time progresses to prevent thermal damage. This enables smaller cable cross-sections to achieve equivalent charging performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes current parameters over time through a charging current profile specifically designed for smaller conducting elements. By defining maximum current for initial time periods and reduced current thereafter, the system enables smaller cable cross-sections to safely deliver peak charging power during critical initial phases while preventing thermal damage, effectively overcoming the current carrying capacity limitations of smaller cables.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the cost and size of conducting elements while ensuring they do not exceed a predetermined temperature, maintaining effective charging performance and adhering to industry standards by limiting temperature rises.

Implementation Method 1

a current greater than the continuous current rating is conducted for less than a predetermined time that is based on an expected temperature rise of the conducting element caused by the current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS9656560B2Charge cycle strategy for vehicles using smaller cross section cable
Publication Date: 2017.05.23 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US9656560B2 patent drawing
  • US9656560B2 patent drawing
  • US9656560B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes a traction battery that is coupled to an external charger via a charge port. The traction battery has a maximum charge current. At least one conducting element between the charger and the traction battery is configured with a continuous current rating that is less than the maximum charge current. A controller within a vehicle charging system is programmed to control the current flow through the conducting element such that a current greater than the continuous current rating is conducted for less than a predetermined time that is based on an expected temperature rise of the conducting element.