Vehicle Control Device Blind Spot Mode Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicle control systems in automatic driving mode may cause occupant discomfort when unexpected maneuvers are required to avoid collisions with non-host vehicles in blind spots, leading to a need for improved discomfort suppression while ensuring safety.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control device that switches from automatic driving mode to driver involvement mode when a traveling plan to avoid a collision in a blind spot is likely to cause discomfort, using a blind spot boundary specifying unit, traveling plan generation unit, determination unit, and switching unit to assess and manage potential collisions, with optional notification to the driver and re-evaluation at additional determination positions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If the vehicle switches to driver involvement mode when a traveling plan to avoid collision is likely to cause discomfort, then occupant discomfort is suppressed, but device complexity increases due to additional determination and switching mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoccupant discomfortVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary determination of whether mode switching is necessary before actually switching modes. The determination unit evaluates predetermined conditions (speed, acceleration, yaw rate thresholds) in advance to predict potential occupant discomfort, allowing the switching unit to proactively transition to driver involvement mode before uncomfortable maneuvers occur, thereby suppressing discomfort while managing complexity through structured evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring traveling plan parameters (speed, acceleration, yaw rate) against predetermined thresholds and using this information to dynamically adjust the driving mode. The determination unit provides feedback signals to the switching unit based on whether conditions are met, creating a closed-loop control system that suppresses occupant discomfort through real-time adaptation without requiring overly complex open-loop control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the vehicle frequently switches to driver involvement mode to ensure safety, then collision avoidance is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to unexpected mode changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance reliabilityVSAvoiddriver operation smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by anticipating situations that would cause occupant discomfort and preemptively switching to driver involvement mode before unexpected maneuvers occur. The determination unit evaluates whether traveling plans meet predetermined conditions (excessive speed, acceleration, or yaw rate) and triggers mode switching in advance, preventing the harmful effect of unexpected automatic driving maneuvers while maintaining reliable collision avoidance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes by monitoring specific physical quantities (speed, acceleration, yaw rate) against predetermined thresholds to determine when mode switching is necessary. By changing the driving mode based on these parameter evaluations rather than arbitrary conditions, the system ensures reliable collision avoidance while minimizing unnecessary mode changes that would disrupt driver operation smoothness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the vehicle maintains automatic driving mode to improve ease of operation, then driver involvement is reduced, but object-generated harmful factors increase due to unexpected maneuvers causing discomfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic driving convenienceVSAvoidoccupant discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously evaluating traveling plan parameters (speed, acceleration, yaw rate) against predetermined thresholds and using this information to dynamically adjust the driving mode. When conditions indicate likely occupant discomfort, the determination unit signals the switching unit to transition from automatic to driver involvement mode, creating a closed-loop control that maintains automatic driving convenience while suppressing harmful discomfort effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary determination of whether mode switching is necessary before actually switching modes. By evaluating predetermined conditions in advance and proactively transitioning to driver involvement mode when thresholds are exceeded, the system prevents unexpected uncomfortable maneuvers while maintaining automatic driving mode during normal operations, thereby preserving convenience while eliminating harmful discomfort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11299176B2Vehicle control device
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11299176B2 patent drawing
  • US11299176B2 patent drawing
  • US11299176B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle control device controlling a vehicle capable of switching between an automatic driving mode and a driver involvement mode in which a driver is involved includes a blind spot boundary specifying unit configured to specify a boundary of a region becoming a blind spot of the vehicle, a traveling plan generation unit configured to generate a traveling plan in which the vehicle does not collide with a moving body assumed to be positioned on the blind spot boundary specified by the blind spot boundary specifying unit, a determination unit configured to determine whether or not the traveling plan generated by the traveling plan generation unit satisfies a predetermined condition, and a switching unit configured to switch the vehicle from the automatic driving mode to the driver involvement mode when the determination unit determines that the traveling plan satisfies the predetermined condition.